No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 24.
320. lappuse
in cases analogous to BLIV.** A test which per se emphasizes forseeability and imminence seems peculiarly inapporpriate for dealing with the kind of rare, sporadic instances of television-induced violence with which BLIV is concerned.
in cases analogous to BLIV.** A test which per se emphasizes forseeability and imminence seems peculiarly inapporpriate for dealing with the kind of rare, sporadic instances of television-induced violence with which BLIV is concerned.
317. lappuse
Since the foundation of BLIV is the premise of a causal connection between real and televised violence , empirical data on this subject will be discussed . The amenability of BLIV to established tort doctrines will then be examined .
Since the foundation of BLIV is the premise of a causal connection between real and televised violence , empirical data on this subject will be discussed . The amenability of BLIV to established tort doctrines will then be examined .
331. lappuse
By holding that the former is not forseeable the Florida court places a burden of unfavorable precedent on cases of the latter type that Niemi and other cases must overcome for a successful BLIV action to occur .
By holding that the former is not forseeable the Florida court places a burden of unfavorable precedent on cases of the latter type that Niemi and other cases must overcome for a successful BLIV action to occur .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 17 |
Union Contracts Employee Management | 47 |
Autortiesības | |
17 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accompanying text supra action actual advertising allow amendment appears applied appropriate authority balancing basis BLIV Branzburg broadcast cable cause charged claims Commission Communications concern confidential consent considered constitutional criminal damages danger decision Defendant denied determine disclosure discussion dissenting doctrine effect fact fairness federal freedom granted held important included individual interest involved issue judge jury Justice less liability libel license limited majority malice mark material means ment newspaper official opinion party patent performance personal attack Plaintiff political present prior privilege protection published punishment question reasonable regulation relevant reporter result rule similar sources speech standard statement station statute Stewart Supp supra note Supreme Court television term tion tort trade trademark trial United violence York