Par šo grāmatu
Mana bibliotēka
Grāmatas pakalpojumā Google Play
The instructions to Lord Lyons might have been regarded as a cause of war..
11. THE UNFRIENDLY COURSE PURSUED BY GREAT BRITAIN TOWARD THE
UNITED STATES FROM THE OUTBREAK TO THE CLOSE OF THE INSURREC-
TION-Continued.
And issued with an unfriendly purpose
M. Rolin-Jacquemyns on the Queen's proclamation...
Unfriendly conduct of Great Britain as to the declarations of the con-
gress of Paris....
Geneva Present
edition. edition.
Former negotiations regarding the declarations of the congress of
Paris
Contrast between conduct of Great Britain toward the United States
in the Trent affair, and toward violators of British neutrality in the
insurgent interest
M. Rolin-Jacquemyns on British neutrality
86
4:0
Proof of the unfriendly feeling of members of the British cabinet and
Parliament
Conclusions
100 45
I. THE DUTIES WHICH GREAT BRITAIN, AS A NEUTRAL, SHOULD HAVE
OBSERVED TOWARD THE UNITED STATES.
The Queen's proclamation a recognition of obligations under the law
of nations
Great Britain has recognized its obligations in various ways.
The obligations recognized by the foreign enlistment act of 1819..
Municipal laws designed to aid a government in the performance of
international duties
Great Britain bound to perform the duties recognized by that act.... 108
48
The duties recognized by that act...................
109
Royal commission to revise the foreign enlistment act of 1819
International law is a part of the common law of England.
Duties recognized by instructions to British officials during the insur- rection
125 55
Correspondence between the two governments in 1793–’94.
Treaty of November 19, 1794..........
126 55
131 57
Construction of that treaty by the commissioners appointed under it.
The neutrality laws of the United States enacted at the request of
Great Britain
III. THE DUTIES WHICH GREAT BRITAIN, AS A NEUTRAL, SHOULD HAVE
OBSERVED TOWARD THE UNITED STATES-Continued.
Correspondence between the United States and Portugal.
Principles recognized in that correspondence
Rules in the treaty of Washington
What is due diligence
Fitting out, arming, or equipping, each an offense
The second clause of the first rule....
edition, edition.
Reasons for a change of language.
Continuing force of the rule
163 69
Duty to detain offending vessels recognized by Great Britain.
The foregoing views in harmony with the opinions of European pub-
The principle recognized by France, Great Britain, Spain, Portugal,
and the United States..
Deposit of the offense
209
Résumé of principles.-
210 87
IV. WHEREIN GREAT BRITAIN FAILED TO PERFORM ITS DUTIES AS A
NEUTRAL.
Admissions of British cabinet ministers
British ports the base of insurgent operations; a partial hospitality
shown to the insurgents; a branch of their government established
in Liverpool; their government vessels officially aided in evading
the blockade, and in furnishing them with arms, munitions, and
means for carrying on the struggle...
The firm of Fraser, Trenholm & Co..
Character of the blockaded coast
Geographical situation of Nassau and Bermuda..
What was done at Nassau
The United States denied permission to deposit coal at Nassau.. Complaints to Earl Russell and his reply ...
Instructions as to hospitalities to the belligerents...
NEUTRAL—Continued.
Lord Palmerston's threats
Geneva Present edition. edition.
Page. Page.
Contraband of war fraudulently cleared at Nassau for British ports.. 236
Résumé for the year 1862
234 96
97
237
These proceedings were an abandonment, in advance, of "due dili-
The rulings in the Alexandra case emasculated the foreign enlistment
act..
259 106
Laird's iron-clad rams...
260 106
Their detention not an abandonment of the lax construction of the
duties of a neutral...............
264 108
The contracts with Arman for the construction of vessels in France.. 266 108
Conduct of the French Government.....
267 109
Contrast between the conduct of France and of Great Britain.
269 109
The Tuscaloosa at the Cape of Good Hope......
270 110
She is released against the advice of Sir Baldwin Walker.
272 110
The course of the governor is disapproved.........
272 111
The Tuscaloosa comes again into the waters of the Colony
273 111
The governor reverses his policy and seizes the vessel...
His course is again disapproved.
Blockade-running
Cotton shipments..
The insurgent government interested in blockade-running.
These facts brought to Earl Russell's notice.
Earl Russell's attention again called to these facts.
Blockade-running in partnership with the insurgent government.... 286 116
274 111
275 112
278 113
282 114
He sees no offense in them....
Mr. Mountague Bernard's list of vessels detained by Great Britain...
The charges in Mr. Fish's instructions of September 25, 1869, are sus-
tained by this evidence..
296 120
300 121
284 115
285 115
V. WHEREIN GREAT BRITAIN FAILED TO PERFORM ITS DUTIES AS A NEUTRAL.
THE INSURGENT CRUISERS.
Earl Russell denounces the acts of which the United States complain
as unwarranted and totally unjustifiable...
309 125
British territory the base of the naval operations of the insurgents... 310 125
Their arsenal..........
310 125
The systematic operations of the insurgents a violation of the duties
of a neutral..
311 126
Continuing partiality for the insurgents
813 126
Recapitulation of hostile acts tolerated in British Possessions.
314 127
These facts throw suspicion upon the acts of British officials toward
the insurgent cruisers..
316 128
They show an abnegation of all diligence to prevent the acts com-
plained of...
317 128
They throw upon Great Britain the burden of proof to show that the
acts complained of could not have been prevented..
318 128
List of the insurgent cruisers.
320 129
The Sumter..
The Nashville..
328 132
The Florida and her tenders, the Clarence, the Tacony, and the Archer. 332 133
The conduct of other nations contrasted with that of Great Britain.. 462 183
VI. THE TRIBUNAL SHOULD AWARD A SUM IN GROSS TO THE UNITED STATES.
Offer of the American Commissioners in the Joint High Commission.
Rejection of the offer by the British Commissioners..
Terms of the submission by the Treaty.
General statement of the claims....
Claims growing out of the destruction of vessels and cargoes.
Merchant vessels
467 185
468 185
469 185
469 186
Government vessels...
470 186