The United States Patents QuarterlyAssociated Industry Publications, 1997 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 78.
1252. lappuse
... confusion as to source of documents , since defendant employers and plaintiff union do not offer competing ser- vices , and since even if documents in ques- tion are evaluated in abstract , no reasonable person , viewing them in their ...
... confusion as to source of documents , since defendant employers and plaintiff union do not offer competing ser- vices , and since even if documents in ques- tion are evaluated in abstract , no reasonable person , viewing them in their ...
1417. lappuse
confusion in the minds of consumers as to the source or sponsorship of defendant's prod- ucts and also confusion as to the relationship between the trademark holder and another seeking to use the trademark . Home Box Office v . Showtime ...
confusion in the minds of consumers as to the source or sponsorship of defendant's prod- ucts and also confusion as to the relationship between the trademark holder and another seeking to use the trademark . Home Box Office v . Showtime ...
1583. lappuse
... confusion is required in order to prove a likelihood of confusion , " a factfinder may " infer from the absence of actual confusion that there was also no likelihood of confu- sion . " Inc. Publishing Corp. v . Manhattan Magazine , Inc ...
... confusion is required in order to prove a likelihood of confusion , " a factfinder may " infer from the absence of actual confusion that there was also no likelihood of confu- sion . " Inc. Publishing Corp. v . Manhattan Magazine , Inc ...
Saturs
Additions and Corrections | 839 |
Classification Outline 101 | 859 |
Table of Cases 317 | 985 |
Autortiesības | |
1 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir accused device action advertising agreement alleged amend appeal applicant's application argues asserted assignment attorneys award brochure CMM's co-owner copy Copyright Act copyright infringement Corp counterclaim damages DC SNY declaratory judgment defendant's defendants denied determination dispute doctrine of equivalents elements estoppel evidence fact factual Federal Circuit Federal district court filed finding fringement FSupp granted inequitable conduct infringement claim invention issue jurisdiction jury Lanham Act license likelihood of confusion literal infringement Lough material matter of law means ment motion for summary parties Patent and Trademark patent in suit patent infringement plaintiff preliminary injunction prior art prosecution history prosecution history estoppel protection pursuant reasonable registration Roussel royalties Rule Schering Section SHADOW TRAFFIC similar specification statutory substantial summary judgment Supp terfenadine tion trade dress trademark infringement Trademark Office unfair USPQ USPQ2d Uwatec verdict WPOR WPOR's Zeneca