Cases Decided in the United States Court of Claims ... with Report of Decisions of the Supreme Court in Court of Claims Cases, 222. sējumsThe Court, 1979 |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
2. lappuse
... issue anew it probably would come out the other way , is not good reason for permitting relitigation of an issue decided in a prior appeal . A prior decision is the law of the case even when the original decision was rendered without ...
... issue anew it probably would come out the other way , is not good reason for permitting relitigation of an issue decided in a prior appeal . A prior decision is the law of the case even when the original decision was rendered without ...
7. lappuse
... ( issue " settled exclusively " on preliminary injunc- tion motion is law of the case ) . C. Although law of the case " is not an inexorable command " ( White v . Murtha , supra , 377 F.2d at 431 ) , as a matter of sound judicial practice ...
... ( issue " settled exclusively " on preliminary injunc- tion motion is law of the case ) . C. Although law of the case " is not an inexorable command " ( White v . Murtha , supra , 377 F.2d at 431 ) , as a matter of sound judicial practice ...
8. lappuse
... issue anew it probably would come out the other way , is not " good reason " for permitting relitigation of an issue decided in a prior appeal . Indeed , a prior decision is the law of the case even when the original decision was ...
... issue anew it probably would come out the other way , is not " good reason " for permitting relitigation of an issue decided in a prior appeal . Indeed , a prior decision is the law of the case even when the original decision was ...
9. lappuse
... issue in 1974 cannot be used 5 years later as justification for reopening this issue.4 In addition , the evidence is irrelevant under the ration- ale of our prior decision . The basis of that decision was that Congress has the exclusive ...
... issue in 1974 cannot be used 5 years later as justification for reopening this issue.4 In addition , the evidence is irrelevant under the ration- ale of our prior decision . The basis of that decision was that Congress has the exclusive ...
23. lappuse
... issue , plaintiff erected pole signs in front of its stores , each sign consisting of a steel tube 20 ' tall , 8 ′ in diameter , with walls thick , set 6 ' below ground level in a concrete foundation which extended 2 % above ground ...
... issue , plaintiff erected pole signs in front of its stores , each sign consisting of a steel tube 20 ' tall , 8 ′ in diameter , with walls thick , set 6 ' below ground level in a concrete foundation which extended 2 % above ground ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1980 the court aboriginal title action active duty administrative Alice Daniel alleged amended amount annuity appeal asserted assignment Assistant Attorney Attorney General Alice attorney of record award clause cloud seeding Congress contracting officer contractor corporation costs counsel counterclaim decedent December 12 decision defendant defendant's motion denied determination employee entitled evidence fact False Claims Act FEBRUARY 29 federal filed Flexifloat foreign tax foreign tax credit franchise Government Government's granted income tax Indian Claims Commission interest Internal Revenue issue January 25 judge's jurisdiction leases ment Minnesota Chippewa Tribe motion for summary paid parties patent payment percent plaintiff plaintiff's motion pole signs powder prior profits pursuant reasonable reclamation refund regulations remanded Renegotiation Reserve retirement Robishaw Rule Sioux Stat statute summary judgment supra tion treaty trial division trial judge Tribe United watershed lands WHTC