Cases Decided in the United States Court of Claims ... with Report of Decisions of the Supreme Court in Court of Claims Cases, 222. sējumsThe Court, 1979 |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
1. lappuse
... decision reported at 203 Ct . Cl . 426 , 490 F. 2d 935 ( 1974 ) . The United States contends ( 1 ) that the court should reexamine the prior decision that aboriginal title was extinguished in 1905 , and ( 2 ) that the Commission applied ...
... decision reported at 203 Ct . Cl . 426 , 490 F. 2d 935 ( 1974 ) . The United States contends ( 1 ) that the court should reexamine the prior decision that aboriginal title was extinguished in 1905 , and ( 2 ) that the Commission applied ...
2. lappuse
... decision reported at 203 Ct . Cl . 426 , 490 F. 2d 935 ( 1974 ) , definitively determined that the Indians ' aboriginal title was extinguished in 1905 , that was a final judgment on that issue impervious to challenge on subsequent ...
... decision reported at 203 Ct . Cl . 426 , 490 F. 2d 935 ( 1974 ) , definitively determined that the Indians ' aboriginal title was extinguished in 1905 , that was a final judgment on that issue impervious to challenge on subsequent ...
7. lappuse
... decision in a prior appeal in the same case unless one of three " exceptional circumstances " exists : " the evidence on a subsequent trial was substantially different , control- ling authority has since made a contrary decision of the ...
... decision in a prior appeal in the same case unless one of three " exceptional circumstances " exists : " the evidence on a subsequent trial was substantially different , control- ling authority has since made a contrary decision of the ...
8. lappuse
... decision was clearly erroneous and works a manifest injustice , and substantial new evidence was presented at the valuation trial . We disagree . 1. The government has not shown that our prior decision either was clearly erroneous or ...
... decision was clearly erroneous and works a manifest injustice , and substantial new evidence was presented at the valuation trial . We disagree . 1. The government has not shown that our prior decision either was clearly erroneous or ...
9. lappuse
... decision . The basis of that decision was that Congress has the exclusive power to terminate aboriginal title , that Executive action could not have that effect unless Congress clearly had manifested its intention that that action do so ...
... decision . The basis of that decision was that Congress has the exclusive power to terminate aboriginal title , that Executive action could not have that effect unless Congress clearly had manifested its intention that that action do so ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1980 the court aboriginal title action active duty administrative Alice Daniel alleged amended amount annuity appeal asserted assignment Assistant Attorney Attorney General Alice attorney of record award clause cloud seeding Congress contracting officer contractor corporation costs counsel counterclaim decedent December 12 decision defendant defendant's motion denied determination employee entitled evidence fact False Claims Act FEBRUARY 29 federal filed Flexifloat foreign tax foreign tax credit franchise Government Government's granted income tax Indian Claims Commission interest Internal Revenue issue January 25 judge's jurisdiction leases ment Minnesota Chippewa Tribe motion for summary paid parties patent payment percent plaintiff plaintiff's motion pole signs powder prior profits pursuant reasonable reclamation refund regulations remanded Renegotiation Reserve retirement Robishaw Rule Sioux Stat statute summary judgment supra tion treaty trial division trial judge Tribe United watershed lands WHTC