Illinois River, Ill., and the Abstraction of Water from Lake Michigan: Hearings Before the Committee on Rivers and Harbors, House of Representatives, Sixty-ninth Congress, First Session, on the Subject of the Improvement of the Illinois River, Ill., and the Abstraction of Water from Lake Michigan. February 11, March 30 and 31, April 1, 2, and 3, 1926Government print, Office, 1926 - 210 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 25.
38. lappuse
... traffic by the ores of the Misabi range ? Mr. BAKER . Something like 80,000,000 tons a year . Mr. SABIN . About 50,000,000 . Mr. MANSFIELD . In the hearings before it was 59,000,000 long tons or 66,000,000 short tons . Mr. DEAL . How ...
... traffic by the ores of the Misabi range ? Mr. BAKER . Something like 80,000,000 tons a year . Mr. SABIN . About 50,000,000 . Mr. MANSFIELD . In the hearings before it was 59,000,000 long tons or 66,000,000 short tons . Mr. DEAL . How ...
59. lappuse
... had originally reported was too small , and in my investigations I find a probable tonnage of 10,000,000 tons , 5,000,000 tons of balanced traffic and 5,000,000 tons of coal , ILLINOIS RIVER AND WATER FROM LAKE MICHIGAN 59.
... had originally reported was too small , and in my investigations I find a probable tonnage of 10,000,000 tons , 5,000,000 tons of balanced traffic and 5,000,000 tons of coal , ILLINOIS RIVER AND WATER FROM LAKE MICHIGAN 59.
60. lappuse
... traffic and 5,000,000 tons of coal , which would be unbalanced traffic . Mr. McDUFFIE . I would like to see the waterways handle that much . I would like to see them utilized , but it would be remark- able if we had one that could do ...
... traffic and 5,000,000 tons of coal , which would be unbalanced traffic . Mr. McDUFFIE . I would like to see the waterways handle that much . I would like to see them utilized , but it would be remark- able if we had one that could do ...
61. lappuse
... traffic . Mr. HULL . Ten millions . The CHAIRMAN . Even if it were 10,000,000 , you would not have any delay in waiting . Mr. CHALMERS . The question that I am asking you just now is the most important question under discussion . Will ...
... traffic . Mr. HULL . Ten millions . The CHAIRMAN . Even if it were 10,000,000 , you would not have any delay in waiting . Mr. CHALMERS . The question that I am asking you just now is the most important question under discussion . Will ...
90. lappuse
... traffic , modern con- ditions . Now , if you take 1,000 feet or 2,000 cubic feet per second , as the lowest that they have estimated for in their reports , that will not fill the channel that they are recommending , 9 feet by 200 feet ...
... traffic , modern con- ditions . Now , if you take 1,000 feet or 2,000 cubic feet per second , as the lowest that they have estimated for in their reports , that will not fill the channel that they are recommending , 9 feet by 200 feet ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
9 feet 9-foot channel adopted amount of water BAKER barges BARNES bill BIXBY boats Canada CHALMERS Chicago River Chief of Engineers commerce Congress Congressman cost cubic feet cubic second-feet depth district engineer District of Chicago diversion at Chicago diversion of water dredging feet per minute feet per second feet wide flow freight going GOLTRA Government Grafton hearing horsepower HULL Huron Illinois River Illinois waterway improvement inches interests Kampsville KUNZ lake carriers Lake Huron lake levels Lake Michigan Lockport locks and dams Louis lower MADDEN MANSFIELD matter McDUFFIE MCLAUGHLIN ment MICHAELSON miles Mississippi River MOONEY MORGAN navigation NEWTON Niagara Ohio Ohio River permit present proposition question RAINEY recommendation removal Rivers and Harbors Sanitary District sanitary purposes Secretary Secretary of War sewage SOSNOWSKI statement Supreme Court TAYLOR thing tion tons traffic transportation treaty understand United
Populāri fragmenti
203. lappuse - States, outside established harbor lines, or where no harbor lines have been established, except on plans recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of War; and it shall not be lawful to excavate or nil, or in any manner to alter or modify the course, location, condition, or capacity of, any port, roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, lake, harbor of refuge, or inclosure within the limits of any breakwater, or of the channel of any navigable water of the United States...
203. lappuse - An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes...
206. lappuse - That the creation of any obstruction not affirmatively authorized by Congress, to the navigable capacity of any of the waters of the United States is hereby prohibited ; and it shall not be lawful to build or commence the building of any wharf, pier, dolphin, boom, weir, breakwater, bulkhead, jetty, or other structures in any port, roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, navigable river, or other water of the United States...
23. lappuse - The following order of precedence shall be observed among the various uses enumerated hereinafter for these waters, aud no use shall be permitted which tends materially to conflict with or restrain any other use which is given preference over it in this order of precedence...
200. lappuse - That it be distinctly understood that it is the intention of the Secretary of War to submit the questions connected with the work of the sanitary district of Chicago to Congress for consideration and final action, and that this permit shall be subject to such action as may be taken by Congress.
203. lappuse - War ; and it shall not be lawful to excavate or fill, or in any manner to alter or modify the course, location, condition, or capacity of, any port, roadstead, haven, harbor, canal, lake, harbor of refuge, or inclosure within the limits of any breakwater, or of the channel of any navigable water of the United States, unless the work has been recommended by the Chief of Engineers and authorized by the Secretary of War prior to beginning the same.
200. lappuse - Chicago River, be unreasonably obstructive to navigation or injurious to property, the Secretary of War reserves the right to close said discharge through said channel or to modify it to such extent as may be demanded by navigation and property interests along said Chicago River and its South Branch. 3. That the Sanitary District of Chicago must assume all responsibility for damages to property and navigation interests by reason of the introduction of a current in Chicago River.
200. lappuse - That penstocks or other similar facilities adapted to possible future use in the development of hydroelectric power shall be installed in any dam herein authorized when approved by the Secretary of War upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers and of the Federal Power Commission...
204. lappuse - MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is a bill in equity brought by the...
10. lappuse - ... can be made, and doubtless give at least the order of magnitude of the effects, which, indeed, for the present purpose, is quite sufficient. It may be well, in this connection, to call attention to the fact that the...