...based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment. Although this inquiry into the facts is to be searching...judgment for that of the agency. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe. 401 US 402, 416 (1971) (citations omitted). The court further stated:...

...narrowly defined duty of holding agencies to certain minimal standards of rationality. " "Although [our] inquiry into the facts is to be searching and careful,...the ultimate standard of review is a narrow one." Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, supra, 401 US at 416, 91 S.Ct. at 824, 28 L.Ed.2d at 153....

...arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion, the standard of review is narrow, and the district court "is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency." Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 416 (1971). In applying this standard of review, the court...

...a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment. . . . Although this inquiry into the facts is to be searching and careful, the ultimate standard is a narrow one. The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency." Citizens...

...judgment. The Court said that "this inquiry into the facts is to be searching and careful . . . [but] the court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency". 151 a new type of case—industry as plaintiff under nepa Since its enactment, NEPA has provided a...

...judgment. The Court said that "this inquiry into the facts is to be searching and careful . . . [but] the court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency".151 a new type of case — industry as plaintiff under nepa Since its enactment, NEPA has...

...the Cache case, but reiterated that the power to review the project as a whole was extremely limited. "The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency," the opinion said. The channelization of the Cache was authorized in 1950 by the Federal Flood Control...

...has been a clear error of Judgment." Although the Court also gave the reassurance that the reviewing court "is not empowered to substitute its Judgment for that of the agency," its discussion indicated that court review of the facts will be exasting." Evidence outside the agency...

...of the relevant factors and if there had been a clear error of judgment. Despite the fact that the inquiry into the facts is to be searching and careful, the ultimate standard of review is narrow, as the court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.175 [ 3 ] This...

...Citizens to Preserve Overtoil Park v. Volpe, 401 US 402, 41G, 91 S.Ct. 814, 28 L. Kd.2d 136 (1971). "The court is not empowered to substitute its judgment for that of the agency." Overtoil Park, supra, at 416, 91 S.Ct. at 824; sec also Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Froehlke,...