...restated the offense: гя The offense of monopoly under § 2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (i) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market...superior product, business acumen, or historic accident. This formulation does not clarify the matter. The problem with it is much the same as that in attempting...

...United States v. Grinnell, 384 US 563 at 570-71 (1965), where Justice Douglas specifically distinguished "growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident" from an offense under Section 2 of the Sherman Act ; or go back to the statement of Senator Hoar, who...

...leading case of United States v. Grinncll, 384 US 563 (1966), the offense of monopoly has two elements: "(1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant...superior product, business acumen, or historic accident. " If the area of expansion of the Times is contiguous to Los Angeles, the market area might be drawn...

...monopoly power in the relevant market, and the maintenance of that power or its willful acquisition, as distinguished from "growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, i ness acumen or historic accident." 1 For 80-odd years, enforcement of the monopoly section of the...

...leading case of United States v. Grinnell, 384 US 563 (1966), the offense of monopoly has two elements: "(1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant...superior product, business acumen, or historic accident. " If the area of expansion of the Times is contiguous to Los Angeles, the market area might be drawn...

...United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 US 563 ( 1966) , the offense of monopoly consists of two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant...or maintenance of that power as distinguished from the growth or development of a superior product, business acumen or historic accident. Judge Devitt...

...monopoly power in the relevant market, and the maintenance of that power or its wlllfull acquisition, as distinguished from "growth or development as a...product, business acumen or historic accident."—' For 80-odd years, enforcement of the monopoly section of the Sherman Antitrust Act has depended on...

...Supreme Court has stated that "The offense of monopoly under §2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant...the willful acquisition or maintenance of that power . . . . " United States v. Grinnell Corp. , 384 US 563, 571-72 (1966). Monopoly power may be inferred...

...Supreme Court stated, 'The offense of monopoly under Section 2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the wilful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from the growth or development of...

...2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) The possession of monopoly power in the relevant market. (2) The willful acquisition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from the growth or development of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident. United States...