Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 81.
22. lappuse
... statutory mandate , the Commis- sion has demonstrated that it will be an aggressive and imagi- native rule - maker , particularly in exploring and expanding the definition of " unfair acts or practices . " This flexible and elu- sive ...
... statutory mandate , the Commis- sion has demonstrated that it will be an aggressive and imagi- native rule - maker , particularly in exploring and expanding the definition of " unfair acts or practices . " This flexible and elu- sive ...
24. lappuse
... statutory right ; ( D ) without observance of procedure required by law . . . . 5 U.S.C. § 706 ( 2 ) ( 1970 ) . By ... statute . See note 4 supra . 16. 29 Fed . Reg . 8324 ( 1964 ) . In explaining the unfairness theory to support this ...
... statutory right ; ( D ) without observance of procedure required by law . . . . 5 U.S.C. § 706 ( 2 ) ( 1970 ) . By ... statute . See note 4 supra . 16. 29 Fed . Reg . 8324 ( 1964 ) . In explaining the unfairness theory to support this ...
242. lappuse
... statutory license fee of 2 ¢ per copy to the copyright holder of the music . This court followed the holdings of other circuits and rules that the compulsory license provisions are not avail- able to tape duplicators . Heilman v Bell ...
... statutory license fee of 2 ¢ per copy to the copyright holder of the music . This court followed the holdings of other circuits and rules that the compulsory license provisions are not avail- able to tape duplicators . Heilman v Bell ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini