Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 61.
312. lappuse
raised the question of whether a right of publicity should de- scend to heirs . The trial court held that the right was descendi- ble , but the decision was reversed on appeal . The case is pres- ently before the California Supreme ...
raised the question of whether a right of publicity should de- scend to heirs . The trial court held that the right was descendi- ble , but the decision was reversed on appeal . The case is pres- ently before the California Supreme ...
324. lappuse
... right of publicity " " " as a form of privacy invasion . Various segments of the opinion al- luded to Prosser's characterization of the right against appro- priation of name or likeness as one of four types of privacy invasion " and ...
... right of publicity " " " as a form of privacy invasion . Various segments of the opinion al- luded to Prosser's characterization of the right against appro- priation of name or likeness as one of four types of privacy invasion " and ...
329. lappuse
neither type of legal protection adequately safeguards the right of publicity.95 The appellate court's ultimate explanation of its decision was that it is " rather novel to urge that because one's immedi- ate ancestor did not exploit ...
neither type of legal protection adequately safeguards the right of publicity.95 The appellate court's ultimate explanation of its decision was that it is " rather novel to urge that because one's immedi- ate ancestor did not exploit ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini