Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 7.
15. lappuse
... Restitution for Australian Land Three firms have entered into a consent order with the Com- mission which will provide for at least seven million dollars in restitution for consumers who purchased shares in Australian land . The ...
... Restitution for Australian Land Three firms have entered into a consent order with the Com- mission which will provide for at least seven million dollars in restitution for consumers who purchased shares in Australian land . The ...
19. lappuse
... restitution , if ordered . Karr Preventative Medical Products Inc. Dkt . 9109 Violation of Consent Order for Throat Lozenges Leads to Civil Penalty of $ 100,000 Merck & Co. has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $ 100,000 for ...
... restitution , if ordered . Karr Preventative Medical Products Inc. Dkt . 9109 Violation of Consent Order for Throat Lozenges Leads to Civil Penalty of $ 100,000 Merck & Co. has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $ 100,000 for ...
22. lappuse
... restitution to injured consumers . See generally , Thain , Corrective Ad- vertising Theory and Cases . 19 N.Y.L.F. 1 , ( 1973 ) ; Note , Corrective Advertising - The New Response to Consumer Deception , 72 COLUM . L. REV . 415 ( 1972 ) ...
... restitution to injured consumers . See generally , Thain , Corrective Ad- vertising Theory and Cases . 19 N.Y.L.F. 1 , ( 1973 ) ; Note , Corrective Advertising - The New Response to Consumer Deception , 72 COLUM . L. REV . 415 ( 1972 ) ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini