Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 52.
174. lappuse
... judge com- mented further : Even the matter of fact attitude of the law does not re- quire us to consider the sale of the rights to a literary pro- duction in the same way that we would consider the sale of a barrel of pork . The man ...
... judge com- mented further : Even the matter of fact attitude of the law does not re- quire us to consider the sale of the rights to a literary pro- duction in the same way that we would consider the sale of a barrel of pork . The man ...
215. lappuse
... judge had instructed the jury , in contrast to the judge's instructions in Time , Inc. v . Hill , that liability could be imposed only if actual malice were found , 52 this case presents no occasion to consider whether a State may ...
... judge had instructed the jury , in contrast to the judge's instructions in Time , Inc. v . Hill , that liability could be imposed only if actual malice were found , 52 this case presents no occasion to consider whether a State may ...
287. lappuse
... Judge Wright . On April 3 , 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari . " Warner - Lambert had argued before the circuit court for a reversal of the order based upon three grounds . The first was that the Commission's con- clusion ...
... Judge Wright . On April 3 , 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari . " Warner - Lambert had argued before the circuit court for a reversal of the order based upon three grounds . The first was that the Commission's con- clusion ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini