Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 75.
105. lappuse
... definition of obscenity thus becomes a ques- tion of constitutional law . To say otherwise would render the notion of first amendment protection a nullity.10 Further , the purpose of the definition of obscenity can now be seen most ...
... definition of obscenity thus becomes a ques- tion of constitutional law . To say otherwise would render the notion of first amendment protection a nullity.10 Further , the purpose of the definition of obscenity can now be seen most ...
106. lappuse
... defined obscenity while rejecting the English definition established in Regina v . Hicklin . 15 " Some American courts adopted [ the Hicklin ] stan- 11. See notes 9 & 10 supra . 12. 354 U.S. 476 ( 1957 ) . 13. Id . at 488 . 14. 413 U.S. ...
... defined obscenity while rejecting the English definition established in Regina v . Hicklin . 15 " Some American courts adopted [ the Hicklin ] stan- 11. See notes 9 & 10 supra . 12. 354 U.S. 476 ( 1957 ) . 13. Id . at 488 . 14. 413 U.S. ...
123. lappuse
... definition of obscenity that sweeps into the speech category everything the community will tolerate . The result of such a definition is that the first amendment casts in constitutional terms the majority's legislative preferences ...
... definition of obscenity that sweeps into the speech category everything the community will tolerate . The result of such a definition is that the first amendment casts in constitutional terms the majority's legislative preferences ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini