Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 85.
245. lappuse
... Defendant publisher was based in Missouri and did not direct any adver- tising to California readers . Less than 3 % of Defendant's reve- nues came from California , and this without any direct sales effort in that state . The court ...
... Defendant publisher was based in Missouri and did not direct any adver- tising to California readers . Less than 3 % of Defendant's reve- nues came from California , and this without any direct sales effort in that state . The court ...
246. lappuse
... Defendants in an article correctly identifying suspects to an attempted bank robbery by name . However , the photograph of the Plaintiff was mistakenly run as the photo of a suspect with the same name . The Co- Defendant television ...
... Defendants in an article correctly identifying suspects to an attempted bank robbery by name . However , the photograph of the Plaintiff was mistakenly run as the photo of a suspect with the same name . The Co- Defendant television ...
253. lappuse
... Defendant's registration of the mark . The court questioned survey evidence of the Defendant which was claimed to negate the possibility of confusion be- tween NOVA for the television show and NOVA for a maga- zine . In that research ...
... Defendant's registration of the mark . The court questioned survey evidence of the Defendant which was claimed to negate the possibility of confusion be- tween NOVA for the television show and NOVA for a maga- zine . In that research ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini