Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 17. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1978 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 81.
178. lappuse
... Corp. v . Day - Brite Lighting , 123 the Supreme Court declared that a state may not , under its unfair competi- tion law , prevent the copying of subject matter that is not patentable or copyrightable under federal law . 124 The Court ...
... Corp. v . Day - Brite Lighting , 123 the Supreme Court declared that a state may not , under its unfair competi- tion law , prevent the copying of subject matter that is not patentable or copyrightable under federal law . 124 The Court ...
187. lappuse
... corporation after written notice objecting thereto has been given by the person portrayed ; and nothing contained in ... Corp. , [ 1966 ] 148 U.S.P.Q. ( BNA ) 755 , 758 ( Los Angeles Sup . Ct . Feb. 11 , 1966 ) . aspects of personality ...
... corporation after written notice objecting thereto has been given by the person portrayed ; and nothing contained in ... Corp. , [ 1966 ] 148 U.S.P.Q. ( BNA ) 755 , 758 ( Los Angeles Sup . Ct . Feb. 11 , 1966 ) . aspects of personality ...
473. lappuse
... Corp. v . City of Chicago ; Kingsley Int'l . Pictures Corp. v . Regents ; Joseph Bustyn [ v . Wilson ] . In Grosjean v . American Press Co. , the Court rejected the very reasoning adopted by the Supreme Judicial Court and did not rely ...
... Corp. v . City of Chicago ; Kingsley Int'l . Pictures Corp. v . Regents ; Joseph Bustyn [ v . Wilson ] . In Grosjean v . American Press Co. , the Court rejected the very reasoning adopted by the Supreme Judicial Court and did not rely ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 13 |
Informational Privacy and the Private Sector | 55 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action apply appropriation Bellotti broadcast California cited claims commercial Commission's concept consent order constitutional consumer contemporary community standards Corp corporate corrective advertising court ruled Cox Broadcasting Corp creative damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's disclosure dissenting doctrine due process fact false light privacy federal Federal Trade Commission film fourteenth amendment Gertz individual infra injury invasion of privacy involved issue Justice legislative liability libel limited Listerine Lugosi ment Miller test moral right obscenity opinion patent offensiveness performer's personal rights Plaintiff political practices privilege Prosser protection public figure record regulation remedy right of privacy right of publicity Robert Welch Rosenbloom Rptr Scripps-Howard speech statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television text accompanying notes tion tort TRADE REG Transfer Binder United Universal Pictures violation Warner-Lambert York Times Co Zacchini