A Treatise on the Law of Patents for Useful Inventions as Enacted and Administered in the United States of AmericaThe Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2005 - 794 lappuses The final edition of a landmark treatise on patents. Originally published: Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1873. xxxvii, 749 pp. "The work of Mr. Curtis on the 'Law of Patents for useful inventions, as enacted and administered in the United States of America, ' is one of genuine merits. The fact that it has reached the fourth edition is evidence both of the ability and need of the work. The first edition was issued in 1849, the second in 1854, and the third in 1867. The present edition is a revision and enlargement of the third, and contains references to most of the important decisions in England and in this country. The statute of 1870 is given in full, in addition to the other statutes on the subject. The present edition of this valuable work is quite indispensable to the patent lawyer. Among the recent decisions we notice Maury v. Whitney, 14 Wall. 434, in reference to the expiration of patents; Rubber Company v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. 788, in reference to the extension of patents; Leyman v. Osborne, 11 Wall. 516, in reference to proceedings at the patent office, and unity or diversity of invention. This treatise ranks among the legal classics." -Albany Law Journal 98 (1874) 9: 98 Better known for his Nationalist interpretation of the Constitution, George Ticknor Curtis [1812-1894] was a prominent New York patent attorney and the author of works on admiralty and equity jurisprudence. Some of his notable works include History of the Origin, Formation and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, with Notices of its Principal Framers (1854), Digest of the English and American Admiralty Decisions (1839), and Rights and Duties of Merchant Seaman (1841). |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 87.
... void . Such a claim is a kind of fraud upon the public , with whom the applicant offers to enter into a contract , when he asks for his patent ; and fraud is never to be pre- sumed , but is always to be proved . The rule , therefore ...
... void ; if not , then his patent is free from any objection on the ground of being broader than his invention . It will not be sufficient , to protect the plaintiff's patent , that this specific machine , with all its various ...
... void , because the same apparatus or machinery had been long in use , and applied , if not to chairs , at least in other machines , to purposes of a similar nature . An examination of the result attained by the plaintiff showed that he ...
... void ; and yet the use of the medicine would be new , and the effect of it as materially different from what is now known as life is from death . So in the case of a late discovery , which , as far as experience has hitherto gone , is ...
... void , for the reason that the same process was known and used long prior to such alleged invention by the com- plainant . ' The defendant then specifies more than twenty persons to whom the complainant's process was known , and by them ...
Saturs
1 | |
24 | |
112 | |
CHAPTER IV | 140 |
Extent of Principle 140 | 155 |
CHAPTER V | 193 |
CHAPTER VI | 249 |
CHAPTER VII | 332 |
Infringement | 369 |
CHAPTER IX | 470 |
CHAPTER X | 538 |
CHAPTER XI | 599 |
CHAPTER XII | 623 |
CHAPTER XIII | 652 |
CHAPTER XIV | 661 |
STATUTES | 667 |