Reports of the United States Tax Court, 126. sējumsThe Court, 2006 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 43.
4. lappuse
... subsequent to the filing of the petition in this case . " ( In fact , the original petition was filed on June 22 , 2001. ) This proposed finding of fact appears inconsistent with respondent's responses to petitioner's in- terrogatories ...
... subsequent to the filing of the petition in this case . " ( In fact , the original petition was filed on June 22 , 2001. ) This proposed finding of fact appears inconsistent with respondent's responses to petitioner's in- terrogatories ...
5. lappuse
... subsequently filed an unopposed motion for leave to file an amended petition in these Tax Court proceed- ings . In her amended petition , petitioner contended that the Appeals Office erred in determining that the proposed levy with ...
... subsequently filed an unopposed motion for leave to file an amended petition in these Tax Court proceed- ings . In her amended petition , petitioner contended that the Appeals Office erred in determining that the proposed levy with ...
20. lappuse
... subsequent proceeding involving the same claim and the same tax year . * * * Accordingly , because taxpayers can claim that they overpaid their taxes ( " paid more than was owed " ) in a sec . 6330 case , majority op . p . 11. note 19 ...
... subsequent proceeding involving the same claim and the same tax year . * * * Accordingly , because taxpayers can claim that they overpaid their taxes ( " paid more than was owed " ) in a sec . 6330 case , majority op . p . 11. note 19 ...
21. lappuse
... underlying tax liability , " the doctrine of res judicata may bar a refund action subsequent to the CDP process " ) . A review of our overpayment jurisdiction explains why the majority's ( 1 ) 17 GREENE - THAPEDI v . COMMISSIONER 21.
... underlying tax liability , " the doctrine of res judicata may bar a refund action subsequent to the CDP process " ) . A review of our overpayment jurisdiction explains why the majority's ( 1 ) 17 GREENE - THAPEDI v . COMMISSIONER 21.
23. lappuse
... Subsequently , the Revenue Act of 1926 , ch . 27 , 44 Stat . 56 , was enacted . Section 274 ( g ) of the Revenue Act of 1926 elimi- nated the overpayment jurisdiction the Board concluded it had in Barry v . Commissioner , supra . Estate ...
... Subsequently , the Revenue Act of 1926 , ch . 27 , 44 Stat . 56 , was enacted . Section 274 ( g ) of the Revenue Act of 1926 elimi- nated the overpayment jurisdiction the Board concluded it had in Barry v . Commissioner , supra . Estate ...
Saturs
169 | |
205 | |
206 | |
215 | |
233 | |
237 | |
266 | |
281 | |
61 | |
62 | |
65 | |
66 | |
72 | |
84 | |
96 | |
108 | |
117 | |
155 | |
157 | |
162 | |
164 | |
167 | |
168 | |
299 | |
300 | |
309 | |
330 | |
332 | |
333 | |
337 | |
338 | |
341 | |
355 | |
360 | |
367 | |
371 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
9th Cir adjustments Admin administrative affd amended amount Anglo-Am Antarctica Appeals officer apply assessment Brand X capital loss Chevron claim closing agreement coal Commis Commissioner community property laws computation Congress conservation easement Court of Appeals December 31 deficiency notice Direct Tea Trading disputed regulations election entitled Fairfax County Federal income tax Federal tax foreign corporation GATT rate Grist Mill property gross income hearing Income Tax Regs income tax return Internal Revenue Code Internal Revenue Service interpretation issue jurisdiction Lee Ranch legislative history levy LIFO limited majority mark-to-market ment method of accounting Natl notice of determination ous payment 99.00 overpayment interest parties petition petitioner petitioner's Planegger Proced provides real property reasonable refund relevant text relief Rept request respondent respondent's Revenue Act rule Secretary section 233 sioner spouse Stat statute statutory Subsequent miscellane supply contracts supra T.C. Memo Tax Court tax lien taxpayer tion United Zapara