Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1961 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
19. lappuse
... Appellant further contends that there has not been cited or suggested that any hydrophobic polymers would be inoperative in the practice of the present invention and that under such circumstances the broad terms should be allowed . [ 4 ] ...
... Appellant further contends that there has not been cited or suggested that any hydrophobic polymers would be inoperative in the practice of the present invention and that under such circumstances the broad terms should be allowed . [ 4 ] ...
20. lappuse
... appellant's request contained in and as a part of the reply brief that the Examiner's answer to the brief be stricken from the record , on the grounnd that it was beyond the time period suggested therefor in Section 1208 , Manual of ...
... appellant's request contained in and as a part of the reply brief that the Examiner's answer to the brief be stricken from the record , on the grounnd that it was beyond the time period suggested therefor in Section 1208 , Manual of ...
22. lappuse
... Appellant has already had such review , and a decision thereon as noted above . Accordingly , claims 1 , 2 , and 9 to 17 are not before us on appeal . [ 2 ] We also note appellant's comments relating to alleged prema- tureness of the ...
... Appellant has already had such review , and a decision thereon as noted above . Accordingly , claims 1 , 2 , and 9 to 17 are not before us on appeal . [ 2 ] We also note appellant's comments relating to alleged prema- tureness of the ...
23. lappuse
... appellant of the brief , uses the mandatory language " shall , " and unequivocally prescribes a penalty for failure to file the brief in time , Rule 193 pertaining to the Examiner's answer , and the portion of said Section 1208 of the ...
... appellant of the brief , uses the mandatory language " shall , " and unequivocally prescribes a penalty for failure to file the brief in time , Rule 193 pertaining to the Examiner's answer , and the portion of said Section 1208 of the ...
27. lappuse
... Appellant appears to admit as prior art only the use of a heavy steel fastener such as would produce the difficulties mentioned above , and it appears that the Examiner's reasoning therefrom as to the use of softer materials would ...
... Appellant appears to admit as prior art only the use of a heavy steel fastener such as would produce the difficulties mentioned above , and it appears that the Examiner's reasoning therefrom as to the use of softer materials would ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
47 CCPA affidavit affirmed alkyl APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellee appellee's applicant's Assistant Commissioner Associate Judges Board of Appeals cerium Chief Judge Clarence W Commissioner of Patents Company composition compounds considered core counsel Court of Customs cumene Customs and Patent decision delivered the opinion device disclosed disclosure District Court District of Pennsylvania erythromycin evidence examiner examiner's fact filed Held IDENTITY AND SIMILARITY-HOW interference invention isoparaffin issue Judge O'Connell Judge WILLIAM Lanham Act likelihood of confusion mark MARTIN material means metal obvious opposer's Oral argument ordinary skill oxide participate in place parties Patent Appeals Patent Office place of Judge Principal Register prior art purchasers pursuant to provisions record reduction to practice reference registration rejection of claims res judicata rhodium Serial similar specification substantially tion tire trademark tube United States Code United States Court United States Senior unpatentable USPQ utility word WORLEY
Populāri fragmenti
581. lappuse - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
374. lappuse - The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled In the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated In./ the inventor of carrying out hit invention.
621. lappuse - service mark" means a mark used in the sale or advertising of services to identify the services of one person and distinguish them from the services of others...
194. lappuse - trade-mark" includes any word, name, symbol, or device or any combination thereof adopted and used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify his goods and distinguish them from those manufactured or sold by others.
201. lappuse - ... would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made.
45. lappuse - ... upon failure of the applicant to prosecute the same within one year after any action therein, of which notice shall have been given to the applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned by the parties thereto, unless it be shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Patents that such delay was unavoidable...
539. lappuse - An application for patent for an invention disclosed in the manner provided by the first paragraph of section 112...
599. lappuse - Registration of a mark on the principal register provided by this Act or under the Act of March 3, 1881, or the Act of February 20, 1905, shall be constructive notice of the registrant's claim of ownership thereof.
248. lappuse - This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 13-21 of appellant's application Ser. No. 297,869, filed July 9, 1952 for "Container-Dispenser for Cosmetics in Solid Stick Form.
94. lappuse - Office or a mark or trade name previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned, as to be likely, when applied to the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers...