The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 98.
. lappuse
... Wetlands , dated July 11 , 1991 279 Exhibit # 3 : An article : The Takings Issue Exhibit # 4 : National Wetlands Newsletter , Volume 17 , No. 2 , dated March - April 1993 Exhibit # 5 : Prepared statement of the National Audubon Society ...
... Wetlands , dated July 11 , 1991 279 Exhibit # 3 : An article : The Takings Issue Exhibit # 4 : National Wetlands Newsletter , Volume 17 , No. 2 , dated March - April 1993 Exhibit # 5 : Prepared statement of the National Audubon Society ...
5. lappuse
... wetlands under the same and similar circumstances . I think it is a flagrant example of how far some of our laws have gone . I want to com- pliment you on being here today . Senator Thurmond ? Senator THURMOND . I just want to ...
... wetlands under the same and similar circumstances . I think it is a flagrant example of how far some of our laws have gone . I want to com- pliment you on being here today . Senator Thurmond ? Senator THURMOND . I just want to ...
20. lappuse
... they are taking your property . Or there is a wetlands regulation and they say you can't grow corn on this piece of property because flora and fauna from 300 years ago would have grown that would make it a wetland . Therefore 20.
... they are taking your property . Or there is a wetlands regulation and they say you can't grow corn on this piece of property because flora and fauna from 300 years ago would have grown that would make it a wetland . Therefore 20.
40. lappuse
... wetland and could not be developed . Under what circumstance would the city be allowed to develop a property that a private citizen would Mr. SCHMIDT . To my knowledge , there is none . Someone here who is an expert on wetlands may ...
... wetland and could not be developed . Under what circumstance would the city be allowed to develop a property that a private citizen would Mr. SCHMIDT . To my knowledge , there is none . Someone here who is an expert on wetlands may ...
45. lappuse
... wetlands support commercial fish harvests worth billions of dollars annually . If compensation schemes render the protection of wetlands prohibitively expensive , the commercial fishing industry would suffer dev- astating financial ...
... wetlands support commercial fish harvests worth billions of dollars annually . If compensation schemes render the protection of wetlands prohibitively expensive , the commercial fishing industry would suffer dev- astating financial ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER administrative agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution contract costs Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation RESS restrictions result SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS
Populāri fragmenti
52. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
268. lappuse - No right to the use of water for land in private ownership shall be sold for a tract, exceeding one hundred and sixty acres to any one landowner, and no such sale shall be made to any landowner unless he be an actual bona fide resident on such land, or occupant thereof residing in the neighborhood of said land, and no such right shall permanently attach until all payments therefor are made.
164. lappuse - Amendment's guarantee [isj designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,
63. lappuse - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the contract and due process clauses are gone.
269. lappuse - Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any right of any State or of the Federal Government or of any landowner, appropriator, or user of water in, to, or from any interstate stream or the waters thereof...
380. lappuse - Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 US 104 (1978) and Benenson v.
269. lappuse - That nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws...
189. lappuse - There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word 'nuisance.
5. lappuse - Court has described the purpose of this clause in the following terms; "[The] Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.
164. lappuse - designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be _ borne by the public as a whole...