The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 62.
26. lappuse
... wildlife population over the next 3 years . This was a vol- untary agreement where people voluntarily surrendered some of their water rights to meet what were aggravated problems - in- creased salinity into the water of the bay ...
... wildlife population over the next 3 years . This was a vol- untary agreement where people voluntarily surrendered some of their water rights to meet what were aggravated problems - in- creased salinity into the water of the bay ...
47. lappuse
... wildlife from drinking water and eating grass on public lands where the rancher has a grazing permit , and that California agribusiness operations who receive water from a fed- eral irrigation project are hoping that bills like S. 605 ...
... wildlife from drinking water and eating grass on public lands where the rancher has a grazing permit , and that California agribusiness operations who receive water from a fed- eral irrigation project are hoping that bills like S. 605 ...
48. lappuse
... Wildlife Service proposed a regulation that would generally exempt landowners in Washington and California owning less than 80 acres of forest land from certain regulations under the ESA associated with the Northern Spotted owl ...
... Wildlife Service proposed a regulation that would generally exempt landowners in Washington and California owning less than 80 acres of forest land from certain regulations under the ESA associated with the Northern Spotted owl ...
72. lappuse
... rights . They do not come from Federal reclamation programs and the Federal Government has simply taken that water for use in the preservation of wildlife or endangered species . Senator BIDEN . Well , then they would have no 72.
... rights . They do not come from Federal reclamation programs and the Federal Government has simply taken that water for use in the preservation of wildlife or endangered species . Senator BIDEN . Well , then they would have no 72.
86. lappuse
... wildlife stocks . Public rights act as a restraint on private uses of property , and that is because private land owners when they are using their property also use resources in common with other people . Some of these are very simple ...
... wildlife stocks . Public rights act as a restraint on private uses of property , and that is because private land owners when they are using their property also use resources in common with other people . Some of these are very simple ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER administrative agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution contract costs Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation RESS restrictions result SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS
Populāri fragmenti
52. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
268. lappuse - No right to the use of water for land in private ownership shall be sold for a tract, exceeding one hundred and sixty acres to any one landowner, and no such sale shall be made to any landowner unless he be an actual bona fide resident on such land, or occupant thereof residing in the neighborhood of said land, and no such right shall permanently attach until all payments therefor are made.
164. lappuse - Amendment's guarantee [isj designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,
63. lappuse - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the contract and due process clauses are gone.
269. lappuse - Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any right of any State or of the Federal Government or of any landowner, appropriator, or user of water in, to, or from any interstate stream or the waters thereof...
380. lappuse - Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 US 104 (1978) and Benenson v.
269. lappuse - That nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws...
189. lappuse - There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word 'nuisance.
5. lappuse - Court has described the purpose of this clause in the following terms; "[The] Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.
164. lappuse - designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be _ borne by the public as a whole...