The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 100.
10. lappuse
... Supreme Court decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors ...
... Supreme Court decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors ...
16. lappuse
... courts have applied , contrary to this bill , for quite a while , particularly since the Penn Central case decided by the Supreme Court , is you look to the aggregate of the property owner's interest , not to a sin- gle portion of it ...
... courts have applied , contrary to this bill , for quite a while , particularly since the Penn Central case decided by the Supreme Court , is you look to the aggregate of the property owner's interest , not to a sin- gle portion of it ...
17. lappuse
... Supreme Court has explained , the Government's right to take private property for public use is the right , obviously , of emi- nent domain , the thing that most people think about , and it , " ap- pertains to every independent ...
... Supreme Court has explained , the Government's right to take private property for public use is the right , obviously , of emi- nent domain , the thing that most people think about , and it , " ap- pertains to every independent ...
18. lappuse
... Supreme Court has developed a body of law around the question of constitutional takings . Very oversimplified , the Court has held that no taking occurs where a regulation promotes health , safety , morals , and government welfare . Or ...
... Supreme Court has developed a body of law around the question of constitutional takings . Very oversimplified , the Court has held that no taking occurs where a regulation promotes health , safety , morals , and government welfare . Or ...
23. lappuse
... Supreme Court case left that issue up in the air and left it open , and the Federal circuit court in the Flor- ida Rock case created a balancing test to determine what is , " par- tial taking . " All we are trying to do is tell the Supreme ...
... Supreme Court case left that issue up in the air and left it open , and the Federal circuit court in the Flor- ida Rock case created a balancing test to determine what is , " par- tial taking . " All we are trying to do is tell the Supreme ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER administrative agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law CONGRESS THE LIBRARY Constitution contract costs Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation RESS restrictions result SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS
Populāri fragmenti
52. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
268. lappuse - No right to the use of water for land in private ownership shall be sold for a tract, exceeding one hundred and sixty acres to any one landowner, and no such sale shall be made to any landowner unless he be an actual bona fide resident on such land, or occupant thereof residing in the neighborhood of said land, and no such right shall permanently attach until all payments therefor are made.
164. lappuse - Amendment's guarantee [isj designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole,
63. lappuse - Government hardly could go on if to some extent values incident to property could not be diminished without paying for every such change in the general law. As long recognized, some values are enjoyed under an implied limitation and must yield to the police power. But obviously the implied limitation must have its limits, or the contract and due process clauses are gone.
269. lappuse - Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws, and nothing herein shall in any way affect any right of any State or of the Federal Government or of any landowner, appropriator, or user of water in, to, or from any interstate stream or the waters thereof...
380. lappuse - Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 US 104 (1978) and Benenson v.
269. lappuse - That nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting or intended to affect or to in any way interfere with the laws of any State or Territory relating to the control, appropriation, use or distribution of water used in irrigation, or any vested right acquired thereunder, and the Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall proceed in conformity with such laws...
189. lappuse - There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word 'nuisance.
5. lappuse - Court has described the purpose of this clause in the following terms; "[The] Fifth Amendment's guarantee that private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation was designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole.
164. lappuse - designed to bar Government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be _ borne by the public as a whole...