 | Washington (State). Supreme Court, Eugene Genroy Kreider - 1899 - 824 lapas
...Cooley, Constitutional Limitations (6th ed.), 654 et seq.; 7 Lawson, Eights, Rem. £ Prac., § 3885. " It is not necessary that the public at large shall be benefited, but only that part of Oct. 1898.] Opinion of the Court — REAVIB, J. the public affected by want of proper drainage or by... | |
 | 1903 - 1040 lapas
...agricultural lands a public use sufficient to justify the exercise of the right of eminent domain, It Is not necessary that the public at large shall be benefited, but only that a part of the public be affected by want of proper drainage : and the public has an Interest beyond... | |
 | 1906 - 1298 lapas
...not necessary, in order to justify the exercise of eminent domain, that the public at large should be benefited, but only that part of the public affected by want of proper drainage. In the Lewis County Case, however, the benefit does not seem to have been confined to a single individual... | |
 | University of Minnesota - 1915 - 280 lapas
...(1872); Re Drain on Pequest River, 39 New Jersey Law, 433 (1877); Tidewater Company v. Coster, 18 New Jersey Equity, 518 (1866). "Zigler v. Menges, 121...connection with the exercise of the power of eminent domain.10 Consequently courts sustaining drainage acts under that power have encountered difficulties... | |
 | Oberlin Historical and Improvement Organization, Ohio - 1917 - 1056 lapas
...court in the early case of Chesbrough v. Commissioners, 37 Ohio St., 508, that it is not essential that the public at large shall be benefited, but only...of the public affected by want of proper drainage. The court in that case observed that the injury from want of drainage and the benefits derived from... | |
 | William Mark McKinney - 1915 - 1390 lapas
...individuals may be specially benefited above others affected by it deprive a drain of its public character.8 It is not necessary that the public at large shall be benefited, but only that a part of the public is affected by want of proper drainage.4 Under some circumstances, it may even... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1882 - 792 lapas
...means for drainage wherever the public health, convenience or welfare requires it. It is not essential that the public at large shall be benefited, but only...want of proper drainage, or by the improvement to be made. The in jury from want of drainage and tbc benefits to be derived from the ditch are necessarily... | |
 | Ohio. Supreme Court - 1917 - 604 lapas
...court in the early case of Chesbrough v. Commissioners, 37 Ohio St., 508, that it is not essential that the public at large shall be benefited, but only...of the public affected by want of proper drainage. The court in that case observed that the injury from want of drainage and the benefits derived from... | |
 | Ohio. Courts - 1899 - 830 lapas
...means of drainage whenever the public health, convenience or welfare requires it. It is not essential that the public at large shall be benefited, but only that part of the public affected by want ot proper drainage, or by the improvement to be made. The injury from want 'of drainage and the benefits... | |
| |
... it is not necessary that the public at large shall be benefited, but only that part of the public affected by want of proper drainage or by the improvement to be... 