The Antitrust Equal Enforcement Act: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, First and Second Sessions, on S. 995 ... April 22, May 11, and December 7, 1981, and February 10, 1982U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982 - 681 lappuses |
Saturs
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 8 | |
| 32 | |
| 39 | |
| 65 | |
| 75 | |
| 77 | |
| 316 | |
| 325 | |
| 331 | |
| 353 | |
| 414 | |
| 421 | |
| 443 | |
| 457 | |
| 81 | |
| 96 | |
| 121 | |
| 140 | |
| 178 | |
| 182 | |
| 205 | |
| 282 | |
| 309 | |
| 492 | |
| 539 | |
| 552 | |
| 586 | |
| 654 | |
| 667 | |
| 680 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
amendment amount antitrust damages antitrust defendants antitrust laws antitrust litigation antitrust violations applied to pending argument Attorneys at Law believe Boise Cascade carve-out CHAIRMAN claim for contribution claim reduction claim reduction rights class action Clayton Act co-conspirators Committee companies complex Congress conspirators contribution and claim contribution claims contribution rule contribution shares Corp Corporation Corrugated Container counsel culpability damages attributable defendant's determine deterrence District dollars EASTERBROOK effect enactment fair federal firm fixing Georgia-Pacific Georgia-Pacific Corporation horizontal price-fixing involved issue joint judgment Judiciary jury lawyers market share Mead ment million non-settling defendants parens patriae parties permitting contribution person plaintiffs Plywood Portland Cement potential liability price-fixing conspiracy problem proposed question reason relative responsibility RENFREW result retroactive right of contribution risk Senator METZENBAUM settling defendants statement statute Strom Thurmond Subsection Supreme Court Susman testimony Texas Industries tion tort tortfeasors Toyota treble damages trial unfair Weyerhaeuser
Populāri fragmenti
440. lappuse - Bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and laws impairing the obligation of contracts, are contrary to the first principles of the social compact, and to every principle of sound legislation.
299. lappuse - There is a clear distinction between the power of the Congress to control or interdict the contracts of private parties when they interfere with the exercise of its constitutional authority, and the power of the Congress to alter or repudiate the substance of its own engagements when it has borrowed money under the authority which the Constitution confers.
295. lappuse - Clteas4KF.Supp.417 (1976) ative negligence rule in this case, since this "court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision, unless doing so would result in manifest injustice or there is statutory direction or legislative history to the contrary.
7. lappuse - When a release or a covenant not to sue or not to enforce judgment is given in good faith to one of two or more persons liable in tort for the same injury or the same wrongful death...
155. lappuse - Any party may move to strike the third-party claim, or for its severance or separate trial. A third-party defendant may proceed under this rule against any person not a party to the action who is or may be liable to him for all or part of the claim made in the action against the thirdparty defendant.
455. lappuse - Court held that retrospective legislation violates the due process clause when it inflicts a "manifest injustice." 416 US at 711, 716-21. The Court explained that the concerns "relative to the possible working of an injustice center upon (a) the nature of and identity of the parties, (b) the nature of their rights, and (c) the nature of the impact of the change in law upon those rights.
235. lappuse - Such commerce is solely regulated by Congress, and when parties make contracts to engage in interstate commerce, they are held to do so upon the basis and with the understanding that changes in the law applicable to their contracts may be made. There can. in the nature of things, be no vested...
359. lappuse - There is no such qualifying word of the "title or ownership" "claimed as against" the corporation by adverse possession. Construction, therefore, becomes necessary, and the first rule of construction is that legislation must be considered as addressed to the future, not to the past. The rule is one of obvious justice and prevents the assigning of a quality or effect to acts or conduct which they did not have or did not contemplate when they were performed.
155. lappuse - The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy...
235. lappuse - There can, in the nature of things, be no vested right in an existing law which precludes its change or repeal, nor vested right in the omission to legislate on a particular subject.