H.R. 521 and H.R. 791: legislative hearing before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, May 8, 2002, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 172 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 31.
7. lappuse
... , the Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma , and the Potawatomi Tribe of Kansas or their members or predecessors or successors in inter- est that could be derived from treaties . This bill also : 1. gives exclusive jurisdiction of claims 7.
... , the Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma , and the Potawatomi Tribe of Kansas or their members or predecessors or successors in inter- est that could be derived from treaties . This bill also : 1. gives exclusive jurisdiction of claims 7.
8. lappuse
... jurisdiction of claims to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ; 2. limits liability to the United States thereby preventing potential claims arising out of other Federal statutes ; 3. gives Indian tribes one year from date of enactment to ...
... jurisdiction of claims to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ; 2. limits liability to the United States thereby preventing potential claims arising out of other Federal statutes ; 3. gives Indian tribes one year from date of enactment to ...
26. lappuse
... jurisdiction . They could neither be abandoned nor sold absent express congressional authorization . The patents issued on the lands in 1850 are void , and the land remains in trust . When the Shab - eh - nay Band merged with the ...
... jurisdiction . They could neither be abandoned nor sold absent express congressional authorization . The patents issued on the lands in 1850 are void , and the land remains in trust . When the Shab - eh - nay Band merged with the ...
59. lappuse
... jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and inferior courts as well as the powers of the Chief Justice . We have reviewed the criticisms and recognize the concerns voiced by opponents of H.R. 521. We now propose changes to the bill which ...
... jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and inferior courts as well as the powers of the Chief Justice . We have reviewed the criticisms and recognize the concerns voiced by opponents of H.R. 521. We now propose changes to the bill which ...
61. lappuse
... jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and inferior courts , as well as the powers of the Chief Justice . We have reviewed the criticisms and recognize the concerns voiced by opponents of H.R. 521. We now propose changes to the Bill , which ...
... jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and inferior courts , as well as the powers of the Chief Justice . We have reviewed the criticisms and recognize the concerns voiced by opponents of H.R. 521. We now propose changes to the Bill , which ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
26th Guam Legislature 521 follows Act of Guam administration amend the Organic appellate court Attorney authority Band of Potawatomi Band Reservation bill branch of government Carbullido Chief Justice co-equal branch Committee on Resources Congressman Court of Guam court system create elected establish extinguish Government of Guam Governor Grouseland of 1805 Guam Supreme Court Guam's judicial Hagåtña HAYWORTH hearing Honorable James House of Representatives House Resolution 521 Illinois independent judiciary Indian Affairs issue Judge LAMORENA judicial branch Judicial Council judicial structure judicial system jurisdiction land claims land in Illinois Letter submitted Miami Tribe Ninth Circuit Organic Act Ottawa Tribe political Potawatomi Potawatomi Tribe powers Prairie Band Potawatomi Prairie du Chien recognized title record on H.R. Section self-government Senator Shab-eh-nay Shab-eh-nay Band Shabeni Superior Court thank Treaty of Greenville Treaty of Grouseland tribal Tribe of Oklahoma U.S. Congress U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court Underwood United
Populāri fragmenti
138. lappuse - Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and, consequently, the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void.
139. lappuse - If an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void, does it, notwithstanding its invalidity, bind the courts, and oblige them to give it effect ? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative as if it was a law ? This would be to overthrow in fact what was established in theory; and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on.
139. lappuse - It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.
65. lappuse - Constitution the judicial power of the United States is vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as Congress may from time to time ordain and establish...
80. lappuse - Jr., a Representative in Congress from the State of New Jersey Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for...
1. lappuse - HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON RESOURCES, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to call, at 11 am in Room 1324, Longworth House Office Building, Hon.
138. lappuse - Certainly all those who have framed written Constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be that an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void, This theory is essentially attached to a written Constitution, and is consequently to be considered by this court as one of the fundamental principles of our society.
49. lappuse - Indian nations, rights secured under Indian treaties and agreements with the United States, and all other rights and benefits to which we are entitled under the laws and Constitution of the United States to enlighten the public toward a better understanding of the Indian people, to preserve...
67. lappuse - ... the several state legislatures retain all the powers of legislation, delegated to them by the state constitutions, which are not expressly taken away by the constitution of the United States.
127. lappuse - Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and in their property, rights, and liberty they never shall be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress...