customers, because it would make any information in reports those institutions are required to give the Secretary As issued, the final regulations paid no heed to this suggestion. No change in the Act would be required to permit the Department of the Treasury to adopt all of these three suggestions made by the National League, if it could be persuaded to do so. The National League respectfully requests the Subcommittee to keep these suggestions in mind in carrying out the legislative overseer duties the Congress placed on itself in the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946. 83-436 - 72 22 GARY K. NELSON ong stone ceeg ble in responding to your eves A Tab 10 12 wanted to give as many ན་* eseble & chance to respond prior Soru ar binds of the National to the Criminal Division of my office, and they heartily concur in the recommendation of General Meyer. I am sorry that we are unable to take a more definitive Please excuse the slight delay in responding to your letter of August 22, 1972. I wanted to give as many of our members as possible a chance to respond prior to communicating to you on behalf of the National Association of Attorneys General. There is no formal machinery by which our Association The matter was referred to the Chairman of our Committee on Criminal Law and Law Enforcement, Attorney General Clarence A. H. Meyer of Nebraska, who has taken a personal position and has informed the members of his committee as well as the Executive Committee of that decision. I would refer you to his Senators, Roman Hruska and Carl Curtis, for the full statement of his position. Stated simply, his recommendation was that the Association oppose the enactment of S. 3828 and S. 3814. I have referred the matter |