Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases, 914. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1915 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 80.
35. lappuse
... defendant ( registrant ) and , as in the present case , it is entirely conceivable that interrogatories may perform as important func- tions as in an equity court proceeding . Equity Rule 58 is as follows : The plaintiff at WHITING ...
... defendant ( registrant ) and , as in the present case , it is entirely conceivable that interrogatories may perform as important func- tions as in an equity court proceeding . Equity Rule 58 is as follows : The plaintiff at WHITING ...
36. lappuse
... defendant at any time after filing his answer and not later than twenty - one days after the joinder of issue , and either party at any time thereafter by leave of the court or judge , may file interrogatories in writing for the ...
... defendant at any time after filing his answer and not later than twenty - one days after the joinder of issue , and either party at any time thereafter by leave of the court or judge , may file interrogatories in writing for the ...
37. lappuse
... defendant ( registrant ) to have his answer stricken out and placed in the same situation as if he had failed to answer . I see nothing , therefore , inconsistent with the rules in the order issued by the Examiner of Interferences , and ...
... defendant ( registrant ) to have his answer stricken out and placed in the same situation as if he had failed to answer . I see nothing , therefore , inconsistent with the rules in the order issued by the Examiner of Interferences , and ...
109. lappuse
... defendant has been restrained from the use of a mark where its goods are as far removed from those of the plaintiff as in the present case , nor of any case where , under such circumstances , an opposition has been sustained . For ...
... defendant has been restrained from the use of a mark where its goods are as far removed from those of the plaintiff as in the present case , nor of any case where , under such circumstances , an opposition has been sustained . For ...
217. lappuse
... defendant appeals . Af- firmed . Messrs . Wood , Wood & Nathan ( Mr. William R. Wood and Mr. Charles C. Linthicum of counsel ) for the appellant . Messrs . Hosea & Knight ( Mr. Marcellus Bailey and Mr. James L. Norris of counsel ) for ...
... defendant appeals . Af- firmed . Messrs . Wood , Wood & Nathan ( Mr. William R. Wood and Mr. Charles C. Linthicum of counsel ) for the appellant . Messrs . Hosea & Knight ( Mr. Marcellus Bailey and Mr. James L. Norris of counsel ) for ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned Abricotine affirmed alleged alternating current apparatus appellee applicant's application assignee Box Car Loader Brenizer carrier cerium Christy circuit court combination Commissioner of Patents connection Construction of Claims construed copyrighted Court of Appeals Decided decision decree defendant described device disclosed District of Columbia drawings Electric elements entitled estoppel evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact February February 20 filed granted Held infringement interference proceeding inventor issue lever limited machine manufacture mark matter means mechanism ment motion motor operation opinion Ottumwa party Patent Office pipe pivotal present primary prior art Priority of Invention proceedings question reduction to practice reference registration reissued res adjudicata Reynolds & Reynolds Riley rotation Rubber Tire rule shaft specification statute structure substantially suit superheater Supreme Court ten-year clause Tesla testimony therein thereof tion trade Trade-Mark Act tube United valve words Yoerg