Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright Cases, 914. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1915 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 55.
2. lappuse
... contends that he should prevail on two grounds : ( 1 ) that the device disclosed in the Wood original and renewed appli- cations is inoperative and ( 2 ) that Wood has abandoned the inven- tion in the sense that he should be held to be ...
... contends that he should prevail on two grounds : ( 1 ) that the device disclosed in the Wood original and renewed appli- cations is inoperative and ( 2 ) that Wood has abandoned the inven- tion in the sense that he should be held to be ...
3. lappuse
... contention is based are substantially as fol- lows : Wood's original application was allowed on January 21 , 1904 ... contends that this was done either with Wood's knowl- edge or under circumstances such that Wood should be presumed to ...
... contention is based are substantially as fol- lows : Wood's original application was allowed on January 21 , 1904 ... contends that this was done either with Wood's knowl- edge or under circumstances such that Wood should be presumed to ...
12. lappuse
... contended that the Lackner patent does not anticipate the applicant's process in that there is no disclosure that the twisting action occurs in the incandes- cent zone and that by reason of the illustration , which shows the in ...
... contended that the Lackner patent does not anticipate the applicant's process in that there is no disclosure that the twisting action occurs in the incandes- cent zone and that by reason of the illustration , which shows the in ...
18. lappuse
... contended by counsel for Moody that the record of this other application of Colby , which matured into Patent No. 849,641 , shows that the claims therein were allowed only on the theory that there was invention in making the primary ...
... contended by counsel for Moody that the record of this other application of Colby , which matured into Patent No. 849,641 , shows that the claims therein were allowed only on the theory that there was invention in making the primary ...
20. lappuse
... contends that the invention in issue was disclosed by Frickey to Ogden and that this disclosure could not be urged in behalf of Cornwall in the prior interference . This case is believed to fall within the doctrine of res adjudicata set ...
... contends that the invention in issue was disclosed by Frickey to Ogden and that this disclosure could not be urged in behalf of Cornwall in the prior interference . This case is believed to fall within the doctrine of res adjudicata set ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned Abricotine affirmed alleged alternating current apparatus appellee applicant's application assignee Box Car Loader Brenizer carrier cerium Christy circuit court combination Commissioner of Patents connection Construction of Claims construed copyrighted Court of Appeals Decided decision decree defendant described device disclosed District of Columbia drawings Electric elements entitled estoppel evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief fact February February 20 filed granted Held infringement interference proceeding inventor issue lever limited machine manufacture mark matter means mechanism ment motion motor operation opinion Ottumwa party Patent Office pipe pivotal present primary prior art Priority of Invention proceedings question reduction to practice reference registration reissued res adjudicata Reynolds & Reynolds Riley rotation Rubber Tire rule shaft specification statute structure substantially suit superheater Supreme Court ten-year clause Tesla testimony therein thereof tion trade Trade-Mark Act tube United valve words Yoerg