.S.- Supt. of Docs. A RE CASES REPORTED. [Decisions of the Examiners-in-Chief are indicated by parallel lines (I), the opinion of the Attorney General by a double dagger (‡), decisions of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia by one star (*), of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals by the letter (d), and of the Supreme Court of the United States by two stars (**).] A. *Adder Machine Company. Comptograph Company v.. *Asbestone Company, The, v. The Philip Carey Manufacturing Company. **Atlas Manufacturing Co. et al., The. Street and Smith v. B. d Baker et al. Grand Rapids Show Case Co. v. *Barber v. Spalckhaver....... Barber v. Wood... *Barclay and Barclay v. The Carter Medicine Company. *Barcley v. Schuler... Barr. Both v. *Barrett Manufacturing Company. In re.. Page. 153 347 146 101 353 294 165 1 97 109 29 176 *Bettendorf v. McKeen.. 173 Blair Company, J. C. The Reynolds & Reynolds Company v. *Bromund Company, E. A., v. Columbia Wax Products Cc.. *Carey Manufacturing Company, The Philip. The Asbestone Company v. dChristy Box Car Loader Co. Ottumwa Box Car Loader Co. v. *Columbia Wax Products Co. E. A. Bromund Company v. v. 148 189 III **Davids Company, Thaddeus, v. Davids and Davids, trading as Davids Manu facturing Company. 367 Dimm. Ex parte . *Ewing, Commissioner of Patents, v. Standard Oil Company of New York.............. *Ewing, Commissioner of Patents. United States ex rel. Dunkley Company and Dunkley v. 205 186 *Ewing, Commissioner of Patents. United States ex rel. Trussed Con rete Steel Company v.. 194 F. d Falls City Woolen Mills. Wm. B. Scaife & Sons Co. v.. *Field and Lanning v. Colman.. *Fleuss and Davis. In re.. Fortescue. Perkins v... *Freeman v. Waid.... Frickey v. Ogden... G. Galle & Company. S. v. Western Grocer Company.. d Garnier. Rossmann v. d General Electric Co. et al. v. Steinberger. **Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company. Rubber Tire Wheel Company et al v. *Gorham Manufacturing Company. In re.. d Grand Rapids Show Case Co. v. Baker et al...... Grissinger. Shreeve v. *Groves. In re. II. 236 200 149 88 196 19 32 223 255 357 103 294 49 144 J. John L. Whiting-J. J. Adams Co. v. Rubber and Celluloid Harness Trimming *Johnson v. Martin.. d Jones v. Evans.. Page. 34 162 262 K. Karl, Prinz zu Löwenstein. Ex parte.. 89 *Keasbey & Mattison Company. Woven Steel Hose & Rubber Company v. 102 202 202 Kindervater. Henderson and Cantley v.... 61 246 d Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. of America v. Story & Clark Co. et al. L. Lawrence & Son, W. A., v. The Licking Creamery Company.. 76 *Lees. Shields v. 111 Licking Creamery Company, The. W. A. Lawrence & Son v... 76 *Lord & Taylor. H. Wolf & Sons v.. 176 *Lorimer and Lorimer and Western Electric Company, Assignee, v. Keith, *Mother's Macaroni Company. The Quaker Oats Company v Ogden. Frickey v............ *Oneida Community, Limited. In re.... d Ottumwa Box Car Loader Co. v. Christy Box Car Loader Co.. Pease. Ex parte............. *Pein. In re.. Perkins v. Fortescue.. *Peters and Dement. Hopkins v. P. 151 178 19 107 327 48 167 88 116 Page. d Pope. Cincinnati Traction Co. v....... 216 95 Prints and Labels. In re. Opinion of the Attorney-General... Q. *Quaker Oats Company, The, v. Mother's Macaroni Company. R. 108 Rubber and Celluloid Harness Trimming Co. Whiting-Adams Co. v......... **Rubber Tire Wheel Company et al. v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company.. d Story & Clark Co. et al. Krell Auto Grand Piano Co. of America v...... **Straus and Straus v. American Publishers' Association et al |