§ 210.20 Procurement of competitors' confidential information by unfair methods and wrongful use thereof.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to obtain information concerning the business of a competitor by bribery of an employee or agent of such competitor, by false or misleading statements or representations, by the impersonation of one in authority, or by any other unfair means, and to use the information so obtained in such manner as to injure said competitor in his business or to suppress competition or unreasonably restrain trade.

§ 210.21 Enticing away employees of competitors.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry wilfully to entice away employees or sale representatives of competitors with the intent and effect of thereby unduly hampering or injuring competitors in their business and destroying or substantially lessening competition: Provided, That nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting employees from seeking more favorable employment, or as prohibiting employers from hiring or offering employment to employees of com-petitors in good faith and not for the purpose condemned in this section.

§ 210.22 Commercial bribery.

It is an unfair trade practice for a member of the industry, directly or indirectly, to give, or offer to give, or permit or cause to be given, money or anything of value to agents, employees, or representatives of customers or prospective customers, or to agents, employees, or representatives of competitors' customers or prospective customers, without the knowledge of their employers or principals, as an inducement to influence their employers or principals to purchase or contract to purchase products manufactured or sold by such industry member or the maker of such gift or offer, or to influence such employers or principals to refrain from dealing in the products of competitors or from dealing or contracting to deal with competitors.

or services, under any circumstance having the capacity and tendency or effect of substantially injuring or lessening present or potential competition, is an unfair trade practice.

(b) Nothing in this section is intended to imply that it is improper for any industry member to solicit the business of a customer of a competing industry member; nor is the section to be construed as in anywise authorizing any agreement, understanding, or planned common course of action by two or more industry members not to solicit business from the customers of either of them, or from customers of any other industry member.

§ 210.24 Unfair threats of infringement

suits.

The circulation of threats of suit for infringement of patents or trade-marks among customers or prospective customers of competitors, not made in good faith but for the purpose or with the effect of thereby harassing or intimidating such customers or prospective customers, or of unduly hampering, injuring, or prejudicing competitors in their business, is an unfair trade practice. § 210.25 Unlawful interference with competitors' purchases or sales.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry, by means of any monopolistic practices or through combination, conspiracy, coercion, boycott, threats, or any other unlawful means, directly or indirectly, to interfere with a competitor's right to purchase his raw materials and supplies from whomsoever he chooses, or to sell his product to whomsoever he chooses.

§ 210.26 Prohibited forms of trade restraints.1

It is an unfair trade practice, either directly or indirectly, to engage in

1 The inhibitions of this section are subject to Public Law 542, approved July 14, 1952-66 Stat. 632 (the McGuire Act) which provides that with respect to a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade-mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, a seller of such a commodity may enter into a contract or agreement with a buyer thereof which establishes a minimum or stipulated price at which such commodity may be resold by such buyer when such contract or Footnote continued on p. 254.

any planned common course of action, or to enter into or take part in any understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy, with one or more industry members, or with any other person or persons, to fix or maintain the price of any goods or otherwise unlawfully to restrain trade; or to use any form of threat, intimidation, or coercion to induce any member of the industry or other person or persons to engage in any such planned common course of action, or to become a party to any such understanding, agreement, combination, or conspiracy.

§ 210.27 Exclusive deals.

It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry to contract to sell or sell any industry product, or fix a price charged therefor, or discount from, or rebate upon, such price, upon the condition, agreement, or understanding that the purchaser thereof shall not use or Ideal in the products of a competitor or competitors of such industry member, where the effect of such sale or contract for sale, or of such condition, agreement, or understanding, may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce. § 210.28 Prohibited discrimination.2

(a) Prohibited discriminatory prices, rebates, refunds, discounts, etc., which effect unlawful price discrimination. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce in the course of such commerce, to grant

agreement is lawful as applied to intrastate transactions under the laws of the State, Territory, or territorial jurisdiction in which the resale is to be made or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale, and when such contract or agreement is not between manufacturers, or between wholesalers, or between brokers, or between factors, or between retailers, or between persons, firms, or corporations in competition with each other.

2 As used in this section, the word "commerce" means "trade or commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State, Territory, or foreign nation, or between any insular possessions or other places under the jurisdiction of the United States, or between any such possession or place and any State or Territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or any foreign nation, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States."

or allow, secretly or openly, directly or indirectly, any rebate, refund, discount, credit, or other form of price differential, where such rebate, refund, discount, credit or other form of price differential effects a discrimination in price between different purchasers of goods of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchasers involved therein are in commerce, and where the effect thereof may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: Provided, however:

(1) That the goods involved in any such transaction are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use;

(2) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or delivered;

NOTE: Cost justification under the above proviso depends upon net savings in cost based on all facts relevant to the transactions under the terms of subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. For example, if a seller regularly grants a discount based upon the purchase of a specified quantity by a single order for a single delivery, and this discount is justified by cost differences, it does not follow that the same discount can be cost justified if granted to a purchaser of the same quantity by multiple orders or for multiple deliveries.

(3) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade;

(4) That nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent price changes from time to time where made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process or

sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned;

(5) That nothing contained in this section shall prevent the meeting in good faith of an equally low price of a competitor.

NOTE: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (f) of this section.

(b) The following are examples of price differential practices to be considered as subject to the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when involving goods of like grade and quality which are sold for use, consumption, or resale within any place under the jurisdiction of the United States, and which are not purchased by schools, colleges, universities, public libraries, churches, hospitals, and charitable institutions not operated for profit, as supplies for their own use, and when:

(1) The commerce requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section are present; and

(2) The price differential has a reasonable probability of substantially lessening competition or tending to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or of injuring, destroying or preventing competition with the industry member or with the customer receiving the benefit of the price differential, or with customers of either of them; and

(3) The price differential is not justified by cost savings (see paragraph (a) =(2) of this section); and

(4) The price differential is not made in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned (see paragraph (a) (4) of this section); and

(5) The lower price was not made to meet in good faith an equally low price of a competitor (see paragraph (a) (5) of this section).

Example 1. At the end of a given period an industry member grants a discount to a customer equivalent to a fixed percentage of the total of the customer's purchases during such period and fails to grant such discount to other customers under like conditions.

Example 2. An industry member sells goods to one or more of his customers at a higher price than he charges other customers for like merchandise. It is immaterial whether or not such discrimination is accomplished by misrepresentation as to the grade and quality of the products sold.

Example 3. Terms of 2 percent 10 days are granted by an industry member to some

customers on goods purchased by them from the industry member. Another customer or customers are, nevertheless, allowed to take a 5 percent instead of a 2 percent discount when making payment to the industry member within the time prescribed.

Example 4. An industry member invoices goods to all his customers at the same price but supplies additional quantities of such goods at no extra charge to one or more, but not to all such customers; or supplies other goods or premiums to one or more, but not to all, such customers for which he makes no extra charge and which effects an actual price difference in favor of certain of his customers.

NOTE: As previously indicated, the foregoing are examples of practices to be considered violative of the prohibitions of paragraph (a) of this section when involving goods of like grade and quality and when not subject to the other exemptions, exclusions, or defenses set forth in this paragraph.

(c) Prohibited brokerage and commissions. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, except for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid.

(d) Prohibited advertising or promotional allowances, etc. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to pay or contract for the payment of advertising or promotional allowances or any other thing of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such member in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such member, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities.

NOTE 1: Industry members giving advertising allowances to competing customers

must exercise precaution and diligence in seeing that all of such allowances are used in accordance with the terms of their offers.

NOTE 2: When an industry member gives allowances to competing customers for advertising in a newspaper or periodical, the fact that a lower advertising rate for equivalent space is available to one or more, but not all, such customers, is not to be regarded by the industry member as warranting the retention by such customer or customers of any portion of the allowance for his or their personal use or benefit.

(e) Prohibited discriminatory services or facilities. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce to discriminate in favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities including, but not limited to, displays, exhibits, and promotional material connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all competing purchasers on proportionally equal terms.

NOTE: See subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which is set forth in the note following paragraph (f) of this section.

(f) Inducing or receiving an illegal discrimination in price. It is an unfair trade practice for any member of the industry engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by the foregoing provisions of this section.

NOTE: Paragraph (f) of this section is a restatement of section 2 (f) of the Clayton Act as amended. In a complaint proceeding under this section, in order to make out a prima facie violation, the Commission must show that the favored buyer induced or received the lower price knowing, or knowing facts from which he should have known, that such price was violative of section 2 (a) of said act and not justified under subparagraphs (2), (4), or (5) of paragraph (a) of this section. When, in any such proceeding, the issue is limited to the question of whether the price differential involved made only due allowance for differences in cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered, the Commission may establish a prima facie case in a number of ways, including:

(1) By showing that the buyer paying the lower price knew that the methods by, and quantities in, which the goods were sold and

delivered to him by the seller were the same as in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices; or

(2) By showing, when there is a difference in the methods or quantities in which the goods were sold and delivered by the seller to the buyer than in the case of the competing buyer or buyers paying the higher price or prices, that the buyer paying the lower price or prices knew the nature and extent of such differences and knew or should have known that they could not have resulted in sufficient cost savings of the kind and character specifiled as to justify the price differential.

NOTE: Section 210.28 is based on the provisions of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act.

Subsection (b) of section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended, which reads as follows, is in amplification of the note to subparagraph (5) of paragraph (a) of this section and of the note to paragraph (e) of this section. "Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor."

§ 210.29 Aiding or abetting use of unfair trade practices.

It is an unfair trade practice for any person, firm or corporation to aid, abet, coerce, or induce another, directly or indirectly, to use or promote the use of any unfair trade practice specified in the foregoing sections of this part.

COMMITTEE ON TRADE PRACTICES

§ 210.201 Industry committee.

The provisions of § 16.1 of this subchapter shall be applicable to an industry committee established under this part.

§ 211.1 Misrepresentation and misbranding of industry products.

It is an unfair trade practice to make or publish, or cause to be made or published, directly or indirectly, any false, misleading, or deceptive statement or representation, by way of advertisement, label, or otherwise, concerning the grade, quality, quantity, use, size, material, finish, strength, thickness, composition, origin, preparation, manufacture, or distribution of any product of the industry, or in any other material respect.

§ 211.2 Misrepresentation as to character of business.

It is an unfair trade practice for any industry member, in the course of or in connection with the distribution of industry products, to represent, directly, that he is a manufacturer of industry products, or that he owns or controls a factory making such products, when such is not the fact, or in any other manner to misrepresent the character, extent, or type of his business.

§ 211.3 Misrepresenting products as conforming to standard.

Representing, through advertising or otherwise, that any set-up paper box or other industry product conforms to a standard recognized in or applicable to the industry when such is not the fact is an unfair trade practice.

§ 211.4 Substitution of products.

The practice of shipping or delivering products which do not conform to samples submitted, to specifications upon which the sale is consummated, or to representations made prior to securing the order, without the consent of the purchasers to such substitutions, or falsely representing the reason for making a substitution, with the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving the purchasing or consuming public, is an unfair trade practice.

NOTE: Nothing in this section shall be construed as preventing the application of such tolerances as are agreed upon between buyer and seller or are otherwise deemed reasonable and proper and where no misrepresentation or deception of the purchasing public is practiced or promoted in relation to the product or its deviation from samples or specifications.

§ 211.5

False and misleading price quotations, etc.

The publishing or circulating by any member of the industry of false or misleading price quotations, price lists, or terms or conditions of sale, with the capacity and tendency or effect of thereby misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers, is an unfair trade practice.

§ 211.6 Deceptive use of trade or corporate names, trade-marks, etc.

The use of any trade name, corporate name, trade-mark, or other trade designation which has the capacity and tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving the purchasing or consuming public as to the name, nature, or origin of any product of the industry, or of any material used therein, or which is false or misleading in any other respect, is an unfair trade practice.