| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1976 - 270 lapas
...defensive purposes," and, and I quote the Soviet Government, "There is no need for the Soviet Government to shift its weapons for a retaliatory blow to any other country, for instance Cuba," and that, and I quote the Government, "The Soviet Union has so powerful rockets to carry these nuclear warheads... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1964 - 132 lapas
...armaments and military equipment sent to Cuba are designed exclusively for defensive purposes. * * * There is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulsion of aggression, for a retaliatory blow, to any other country, for instance Cuba. * * *... | |
| United States. Dept. of State - 1962 - 352 lapas
...defensive purposes," and, and I quote the Soviet Government, "There is no need for the Soviet Government to shift its weapons for a retaliatory blow to any other country, for instance Cuba," and that, and I quote the Government, "The Soviet Union has so powerful rockets to carry these nuclear warheads... | |
| Raymond Garthoff - 2011 - 254 lapas
..."The arms and military equipment sent to Cuba are designated solely for defensive purposes," and also that "there is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulse of aggression, for a retaliatory strike, to any other country, for instance Cuba. . . .... | |
| 1963 - 1424 lapas
...armaments and military equipment sent to Cuba are designed exclusively for defensive purposes. . . . There is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulsion of aggression, for a retaliatory blow, to any other country, for instance Cuba. . . .... | |
| 1993 - 432 lapas
...TASS statement of 11 September 1962: "The Government of the Soviet Union also authorized TASS to state that there is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulsion of aggression, for a retaliatory blow, to any other country, for instance Cuba." Frauda,... | |
| Denise M. Bostdorff - 1994 - 326 lapas
...defensive purposes," that, and I quote the Soviet Government, "there is no need for the Soviet Government to shift its weapons. . . for a retaliatory blow to any other country, for instance Cuba," and that, and I quote their government, "the Soviet Union has so powerful rockets to carry these nuclear warheads... | |
| Jutta Weldes - 1996 - 330 lapas
...arms buildup it was supporting in Cuba was defensive, that "there is no need for the Soviet Government to shift its weapons for a retaliatory blow to any other country, for instance Cuba" (Kennedy, 1962.c: 3),3 it was now deploying offensive nuclear weapons capable of striking targets in... | |
| Ernest R May, Philip D Zelikow - 2002 - 580 lapas
...TASS statement of September 1 /] "The government of the Soviet Union also authorized TASS to state that there is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulsion of aggression for a retaliatory blow to any other country, for instance, Cuba. Our nuclear... | |
| Servando Gonzalez - 2002 - 434 lapas
...to third nations: 118 SERVANDO GONZALEZ The government of the Soviet Union authorizes TASS to state that there is no need for the Soviet Union to shift its weapons for the repulsion of aggression, for a retaliatory blow, to any other country, for instance Cuba. Our nuclear... | |
| |