No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 40.
61. lappuse
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
64. lappuse
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice.2 Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 USPQ 169 ( Bd . App . 1943 ) ...
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice.2 Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 USPQ 169 ( Bd . App . 1943 ) ...
78. lappuse
Rules 282 and 2832 provide for use in evidence of official records and printed publications and testimony taken in another interference or action . Del . 1966 ) ; s.c. 264 F.Supp . 734 ( 1967 ) limiting discovery , aff'd 388 F.2d 215 ...
Rules 282 and 2832 provide for use in evidence of official records and printed publications and testimony taken in another interference or action . Del . 1966 ) ; s.c. 264 F.Supp . 734 ( 1967 ) limiting discovery , aff'd 388 F.2d 215 ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | 1 |
The Steps Subsequent to the Declaration and Prior | 27 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving issue JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ