Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 17.
85. lappuse
... specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided . The times specified herein are calendar days . If the last day of the time specified ...
... specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided . The times specified herein are calendar days . If the last day of the time specified ...
95. lappuse
... specified time , not less than thirty days , under Rule 203 . ( b ) found in patent issued to another - must be done ... specified time , or extension . thereof , and amendment of same , under Rules 207 , 215-27 . 5. File motions under ...
... specified time , not less than thirty days , under Rule 203 . ( b ) found in patent issued to another - must be done ... specified time , or extension . thereof , and amendment of same , under Rules 207 , 215-27 . 5. File motions under ...
96. lappuse
... specified , under Rule 256 . 12. Request for recommendation by Board of Patent In- terferences , under Rule 259 . 13. Petition for rehearing reconsideration , or modifica- tion of decision , within thirty days , under Rule 256 . 14 ...
... specified , under Rule 256 . 12. Request for recommendation by Board of Patent In- terferences , under Rule 259 . 13. Petition for rehearing reconsideration , or modifica- tion of decision , within thirty days , under Rule 256 . 14 ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА