Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 12.
18. lappuse
... reads on the adversary disclosures individually . It must mean the same thing in both cases . Smith v . Wehn , 318 F. 2d 325 ( CCPA 1963 ) ; Henning v . Hunt , supra . It may not be an " interloper . ' Cover v . Schwartz , 116 F.2d 516 ...
... reads on the adversary disclosures individually . It must mean the same thing in both cases . Smith v . Wehn , 318 F. 2d 325 ( CCPA 1963 ) ; Henning v . Hunt , supra . It may not be an " interloper . ' Cover v . Schwartz , 116 F.2d 516 ...
101. lappuse
... reads on the subject applica- as follows : ( Here the claim is applied , first to the disclo- sure of one application , and then to the disclosure of the other application in the manner previously indicated . ) Notice under Section 135 ...
... reads on the subject applica- as follows : ( Here the claim is applied , first to the disclo- sure of one application , and then to the disclosure of the other application in the manner previously indicated . ) Notice under Section 135 ...
115. lappuse
... read on the disclosure of the application of without in- terpreting the count in a manner inconsistent with its language ... reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two counts are identical except that Count 2 ...
... read on the disclosure of the application of without in- terpreting the count in a manner inconsistent with its language ... reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two counts are identical except that Count 2 ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА