No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 5.
103. lappuse
... and clampingly securing panels of the character specified in those counts to the support bars in abutting relationship with the next adjacent panel as required by the counts , there is nothing in the specification or drawings of ...
... and clampingly securing panels of the character specified in those counts to the support bars in abutting relationship with the next adjacent panel as required by the counts , there is nothing in the specification or drawings of ...
104. lappuse
The clamping of panels 12 comprising channels 20 and 21 to the cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ............ application , p . 6 , line 9 ) .
The clamping of panels 12 comprising channels 20 and 21 to the cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ............ application , p . 6 , line 9 ) .
107. lappuse
1 , 2 , 7 ) , and means securing said panels in arranged relation ( C 14 , 26 , 32 , Figs . 1 , 2 , 5 ; K 18 , 18a - b - c , 20 , 20a - b - c , 48 , 50 , 52 , Figs . 1 , 2 , 5 , 8 ) , said securing means being adapted normally to hold ...
1 , 2 , 7 ) , and means securing said panels in arranged relation ( C 14 , 26 , 32 , Figs . 1 , 2 , 5 ; K 18 , 18a - b - c , 20 , 20a - b - c , 48 , 50 , 52 , Figs . 1 , 2 , 5 , 8 ) , said securing means being adapted normally to hold ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | 1 |
The Steps Subsequent to the Declaration and Prior | 27 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving issue JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ