Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 10.
18. lappuse
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing ...
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing ...
19. lappuse
A count if ambiguous , will be interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.1 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ...
A count if ambiguous , will be interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.1 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ...
92. lappuse
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts generally are to be ...
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts generally are to be ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА