Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 4.
18. lappuse
... extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing to such performance regardless of number or ...
... extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing to such performance regardless of number or ...
84. lappuse
... extend the time in a proper case as provided in Rule 183. An extension was refused in Sockman v . Switzer , ( Com'r . Pats . 1962 ) , no extraordinary situation being presented ; similarly , in Kletzer v . Dodson , 1904 C.D. 100 , where ...
... extend the time in a proper case as provided in Rule 183. An extension was refused in Sockman v . Switzer , ( Com'r . Pats . 1962 ) , no extraordinary situation being presented ; similarly , in Kletzer v . Dodson , 1904 C.D. 100 , where ...
85. lappuse
... extended to thirty days after action on the petition . No petition for rehearing or reconsideration filed outside the time specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period ...
... extended to thirty days after action on the petition . No petition for rehearing or reconsideration filed outside the time specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА