No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 6.
18. lappuse
The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all ...
The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all ...
84. lappuse
Watson , 268 F. ( 2d ) 891 ( CADC 1959 ) the Commissioner may extend the time in a proper case as provided in Rule 183. An extension was refused in Sockman v . Switzer , ( Com'r . Pats . 1962 ) , no extraordinary situation being ...
Watson , 268 F. ( 2d ) 891 ( CADC 1959 ) the Commissioner may extend the time in a proper case as provided in Rule 183. An extension was refused in Sockman v . Switzer , ( Com'r . Pats . 1962 ) , no extraordinary situation being ...
85. lappuse
... Board of Appeals or Board of Patent Interferences , the time is extended to thirty days after action on the petition . ... nor any proceedings on such petition shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided .
... Board of Appeals or Board of Patent Interferences , the time is extended to thirty days after action on the petition . ... nor any proceedings on such petition shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | 1 |
The Steps Subsequent to the Declaration and Prior | 27 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving issue JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ