Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 14.
92. lappuse
... disclosed in that patent . It appeared that if the quoted phrase were interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while ...
... disclosed in that patent . It appeared that if the quoted phrase were interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while ...
116. lappuse
... Disclosed In That Application , And Includes Definitions Of Structure , And Operation To Which The Disclosure Of That Application Does Not Respond . ( here point out difference ) The Structure Disclosed In The Application Of And Is ...
... Disclosed In That Application , And Includes Definitions Of Structure , And Operation To Which The Disclosure Of That Application Does Not Respond . ( here point out difference ) The Structure Disclosed In The Application Of And Is ...
124. lappuse
... disclosed in the application of the said senior party is in- operative to perform the function stated in the counts ... disclose automat- ically controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11. That the Board erred in finding ...
... disclosed in the application of the said senior party is in- operative to perform the function stated in the counts ... disclose automat- ically controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11. That the Board erred in finding ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА