Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 24.
24. lappuse
... Request by Primary Examiner When another conflicting application appears , the pri- mary examiner requests suspension of the interference , under Rule 238 , in order to add that application to the interference . Where no testimony has ...
... Request by Primary Examiner When another conflicting application appears , the pri- mary examiner requests suspension of the interference , under Rule 238 , in order to add that application to the interference . Where no testimony has ...
35. lappuse
... requests that final hearing be set to review such matters . " Motions made under Rule 225 , should present one or more of the grounds for motion set forth in Rule 231.1 Preferably they request that the entry of judgment be withheld ...
... requests that final hearing be set to review such matters . " Motions made under Rule 225 , should present one or more of the grounds for motion set forth in Rule 231.1 Preferably they request that the entry of judgment be withheld ...
137. lappuse
... REQUEST Corporation Hon . Commissioner of Patents Washington 25 , D. C. Sir : It is requested in behalf of the party application for United States Letters Patent of and ..... Serial No. -9 1941 , to which reference is made in that filed ...
... REQUEST Corporation Hon . Commissioner of Patents Washington 25 , D. C. Sir : It is requested in behalf of the party application for United States Letters Patent of and ..... Serial No. -9 1941 , to which reference is made in that filed ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА