Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1969 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 38.
6. lappuse
... Examiner ; Effect Usually , in the case of pending applications , one is filed without knowledge of another , and so the claims of the rival applicants are not ... Primary Examiner; Effect Copying Those of Another's Application Patent.
... Examiner ; Effect Usually , in the case of pending applications , one is filed without knowledge of another , and so the claims of the rival applicants are not ... Primary Examiner; Effect Copying Those of Another's Application Patent.
23. lappuse
... primary examiner may act as judge ; 2 ( 3 ) a request of the primary examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of the interference proceeding ; this may be for the pur- pose of a ruling pertaining to ...
... primary examiner may act as judge ; 2 ( 3 ) a request of the primary examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of the interference proceeding ; this may be for the pur- pose of a ruling pertaining to ...
24. lappuse
... primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion , de- cision thereon may be incorporated in the decision on the motion , but the parties shall ...
... primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion , de- cision thereon may be incorporated in the decision on the motion , but the parties shall ...
Saturs
Introduction | liv |
I | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 17 |
Autortiesības | |
10 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ action under 35 adversary adversary's affidavits amend Attorneys award of priority Board of Patent Botnen Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company considered Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision disclosed disclosure dissolution double patenting effect estoppel evidence F 2d F.Supp ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving JPOS judgment jurisdiction Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition Philco preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refused res adjudicata senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer taking testimony tion ССРА