 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1955 - 418 lapas
...at the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." In Docket No. 31423, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al. v. St. Louis-San... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 1322 lapas
...time of ricssy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority. language in 1'lessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is rejected. "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of 'separate but has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal."... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1959 - 710 lapas
...to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racially integrated school system.' "We conclude that in the field of public education...inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs * * * are. by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws... | |
 | Scott Brewer - 1998 - 404 lapas
...in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone. . . . We conclude that in the field of public education...that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated . . . are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws... | |
 | Annetta Louise Gomez-Jefferson - 1998 - 516 lapas
...Joseph and Hazel's delight, the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice Earl Warren as its spokesman, decreed: "We conclude that in the field of public education...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." Thus it struck down the 1896 Plessy vs. Ferguson decision that had sanctioned segregated schools. Winning... | |
 | Ronald J. Samuda - 1998 - 300 lapas
...to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racially integrated school system. We conclude that in the field of public education...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. . . . Such segregation is a denial of the equal protection of the laws. (Brown v. Bourd of Education... | |
 | Lee D. Baker - 1998 - 350 lapas
...the time of Plessy v. Ferguson, this finding is amply supported by modern authority." Any language in Plessy v. Ferguson contrary to this finding is...We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.52... | |
 | James C. Klotter - 1992 - 412 lapas
...Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. Board of Education ofTopeka (1954) ended segregation in schools. We conclude that in the field of public education...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Figure 8.3 Louisville native and former heavyweight boxing champion Muhammad Ali ( University of Louisville... | |
 | Jim F. Watts, Fred L. Israel - 2000 - 416 lapas
...Warren read the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in the case Brown v. School Board of Topeka: "We conclude that in the field of public education...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" This removal of legal justification for segregation in public schools was unpopular with many Americans... | |
 | Kathy Sammis - 2000 - 136 lapas
...to deprive them of some of the benefits they would receive in a racially integrated school system. We conclude that in the field of public education...Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. 1. Compare this decision with Plessy v. Ferguson. (a) What was the basis of the Court's reasoning in... | |
| |
We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. 
