24. Pan Fligh

OF THE

COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

FOR

THE YEAR 1876.

WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE.

Busha rs. Phelps and Edmunds et al., (interference; appeal)

Carmichael, James Y., (appeal)..

Carroll vs. Morse, (interference)

119

239

61

Chambers and Mendham rs. Duncan, Wilson, and Lauder, (interference)..............
Chambers and Mendham vs. Duncan, Wilson, and Lauder et al., (interlocutory

223

De Sanno, Walter, rs. C. F. Ritchell, (interference; appeal).

98

Dunton, Jacob, Thomas J. Young, and J. A. McFerran, (interlocutory appeal)..

167

Farnsworth, Luther H., vs. E. O. P. Andrews, (interference)

3

Gordon, Jas. F., vs. Chas. B. Withington, (appeal; interference)
Gould, J. C., (appeal)..........

110

164

Guest rs. Finch, (interference; appeal)..

144

Page.

Hanscom, W. H., vs. O. B. Latham, (interference; appeal)

140

Lautz Bros. & Co. vs. Shultz & Co., (trade-mark; interference).......

90

Lavees, George W., et al., (appeal)

Lawrence & Co., (trade-mark; appeal).

Lay vs. Wiard, (interference)

Little vs. Lillie, Pillard, and Sargent, (interference)....

Loeser, S. and I., (interlocutory appeal)

Lull, Harvey, (extension).......

Martin, H. M., v8. G. Olney et al., (interference).

Mason, J. L., (appeal)

McCloskey, J., (appeal)..

McIntire, J. S., (interlocutory appeal)

McLaren, J. C., and C. B. Coventry, (appeal).......

Merrill and Merrill vs. Glidden, (interference; appeal)

Oliver vs. Zeller, (interference)

105

155

54

207

104

166

124

151

24

34

McKnight, A. C., vs. A. Van Wagenen, (interference; appeal)...

126

184

243

187

Walpuski vs. Jacobsen and Faber, (interference; appeal).
Walton, W. R., (interlocutory appeal)......

114

162