Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1919 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U.S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 55.
xxx. lappuse
... reference to prior patents as to advance , claims immaterial except to clear obscurity . a General Electric Co. v . Cooper Hewitt Electric Co ‒‒‒ Granted on an invention in controversy after the filing of an appli- cation for the same ...
... reference to prior patents as to advance , claims immaterial except to clear obscurity . a General Electric Co. v . Cooper Hewitt Electric Co ‒‒‒ Granted on an invention in controversy after the filing of an appli- cation for the same ...
2. lappuse
... reference cited against C's application involved in this interference . APPEAL from Examiners - in - Chief . ELECTRIC REGULATION . Mr. Charles McC . Chapman and Messrs . Sturtevant , & Mason for Creveling . Messrs . Kenyon & Kenyon for ...
... reference cited against C's application involved in this interference . APPEAL from Examiners - in - Chief . ELECTRIC REGULATION . Mr. Charles McC . Chapman and Messrs . Sturtevant , & Mason for Creveling . Messrs . Kenyon & Kenyon for ...
13. lappuse
... reference to questions pertaining to pro- ceedings necessary to obtain a patent and to the trial of an issue of priority between applications while they remain within the jurisdic- tion of the Patent Office , which may be here neglected ...
... reference to questions pertaining to pro- ceedings necessary to obtain a patent and to the trial of an issue of priority between applications while they remain within the jurisdic- tion of the Patent Office , which may be here neglected ...
15. lappuse
... reference to prior invention ? With reference to an issue of priority between conflicting claims , the difference is that between an appli- cant who asserts his right and one who does not . If an applicant does not assert his right ...
... reference to prior invention ? With reference to an issue of priority between conflicting claims , the difference is that between an appli- cant who asserts his right and one who does not . If an applicant does not assert his right ...
17. lappuse
... reference to a dif ferent date . But this reasoning is applicable only to a copending patent in which the invention in controversy or so much of it as the public may have become entitled to might have been claimed . In Miller v . Eagle ...
... reference to a dif ferent date . But this reasoning is applicable only to a copending patent in which the invention in controversy or so much of it as the public may have become entitled to might have been claimed . In Miller v . Eagle ...
Saturs
212 | |
215 | |
227 | |
231 | |
240 | |
246 | |
250 | |
252 | |
74 | |
82 | |
89 | |
93 | |
99 | |
107 | |
116 | |
124 | |
126 | |
131 | |
133 | |
151 | |
153 | |
160 | |
169 | |
180 | |
188 | |
198 | |
200 | |
201 | |
206 | |
255 | |
269 | |
276 | |
278 | |
289 | |
294 | |
303 | |
310 | |
312 | |
316 | |
336 | |
344 | |
369 | |
375 | |
381 | |
382 | |
393 | |
395 | |
398 | |
412 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandoned affirmed alleged amend anticipation apparatus appellant's appellee application Assistant Commissioner cancelation carbon pile Circuit Court claims combination Commissioner of Patents Company construction cottonseed oil counts Court of Appeals Creveling Decided decision decree defendant descriptive device disclosed disclosure dismissed District Court District of Columbia Electric elements entitled evidence Examiner of Interferences Examiners-in-Chief extending fact filed glycerids granted held infringement interference proceeding invention in controversy inventor involved issue jurisdiction lever machine mandamus manufacture mark matter McAfee means Meccano mechanical ment metal motion operation opinion opposition proceedings original party patent in suit patent law Patent Office perforated petition petitioner plaintiff plate Primary Examiner prior art prior invention priority of invention question reduction to practice refused registration reissue res adjudicata result Revised Statutes rheostat rule specification subject-matter supra testimony tion trade trade-mark tube United word
Populāri fragmenti
243. lappuse - ... or more than two years prior to his application, and not in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years...
243. lappuse - ... not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
31. lappuse - That he was not the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented; or, Fifth.
340. lappuse - And: x"That whenever an Invention described In and covered by a patent of the United States shall hereafter be used or manufactured by or for the United States...
102. lappuse - Whenever an application is made for a patent which, in the opinion of the Commissioner, would interfere with any pending application, or with any unexpired patent, he shall give notice thereof to the applicants, or applicant and patentee, as the case may be. The question of priority of invention...
185. lappuse - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trademark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
184. lappuse - That no mark by which the goods of the owner of the mark may be distinguished from other goods of the same class...
243. lappuse - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
88. lappuse - The applicant shall make oath that he does verily believe himself to be the original and first inventor or discoverer of the art, machine, manufacture, composition, or improvement, or of the variety of plant, for which he solicits a patent; that he does not know and does not believe that the same was ever before known or used; and shall state of what country he is a citizen.
196. lappuse - Courts should regard with jealousy and disfavor any attempts to enlarge the scope of an application once filed, or of a patent once granted, the effect of which would be to enable the patentee to appropriate other inventions made prior to such alteration, or to appropriate that which has in the meantime gone into public use.