Lapas attēli


2001, District Judge Norma Holloway Johnson accepted the joint report of the Library


and the Cook class action plaintiffs, which resolved the disputes related to a 1998

motion filed by plaintiffs alleging violations of the 1996 settlement agreement. The joint

report includes a new Library hiring process to be used from March 1, 2001, through

December 1, 2002, and a new statistical methodology to be used to report on the new

ing of

hiring process. All other matters contained in the 1996 Settlement Agreement expired


upon the court's January 18, 2001, order.

- Center for Russian Leadership Development

As part of the fiscal 2001 legislative branch appropriations bill, the Congress


approved the establishment of the Center for Russian Leadership Development, a

permanent center to provide emerging political leaders of Russia with firsthand exposure


to the American free market economic system and the operation of the American


democratic institutions. The Library's budget for fiscal years 2000 and 2001 funded

[ocr errors]

successful pilot programs that brought an unprecedented 3,650 Russian political leaders

to America. Because the center is not yet independently organized and will not be part

of the Library's fiscal 2002 budget, the Library has included on behalf of the center (as


an information item only) a $10 million request for the center's appropriated support. We

anticipate that the center's board, when appointments to the Board have been made by

the House, Senate, and Librarian of Congress, will submit an amended budget

[ocr errors]

justification to the Congress.

- Summary

"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance," James Madison wrote in 1822. “And

a people who mean to be their own governours, must arm themselves with the power

which knowledge brings." In 1800, the Congress established a Congressional Library to

help provide it with the information required to administer this questioning and expanding

land. Thanks to the continuing vision and support of the Congress, its Library has

expanded and become not only a resource for the Congress but also the de facto

national library of the United States and one of the world's greatest intellectual and

cultural resources.

At the start of the third millennium and the Library's third century, the Library

must acquire, preserve, and ensure rights-protected access to "born digital works that

are playing an increasingly important role in the intellectual, commercial, and creative

life of the United States. The amount of "bom digital works that have already been lost

is unknown but substantial. The average life of a Web page is only about 75 days.

Given the immeasurable size and short life span of much of the Web's content, the

Library clearly faces a substantial challenge in both (1) defining the scope of its

collecting responsibilities in this new world and (2) developing a whole new range of

partnerships and cooperative relationships to continue fulfilling our central historic

mission in the new digital universe. In conformity with the Congress's recent special

appropriation, the Library's digital strategy will focus first on formulating an

implementable national strategy for the life-cycle management of digital materials as part

of the national collection. The Library must make sure that it has the digital

infrastructure that can be scaled in the future to support and sustain the national digital

information strategy that we will be cooperatively developing.

Librarians will be needed more than ever before as objective knowledge

navigators amid the sea of unorganized and often undependable information that is

increasingly inundating the Internet. Libraries will be needed to assure free public

access for those who would otherwise be on the losing side of the digital divide -- and

also for those who might otherwise never learn to work both with new information and

with old books. Libraries, like America itself, add the new without subtracting the old.

e' and

Properly used, the Internet will help (a) scientifically to solve common problems shared

by widely dispersed groups in fields like health and the environment, and (b)

humanistically to share on-line the materials that express the distinctive cultural identities

of different peoples.

On behalf of the Library and its staff, I thank the Congress and the American

been is

people for the outpouring of support for the Library of Congress during its bicentennial

celebration. The Library celebrated its 200th anniversary last year with a wide array of



programs and activities. A resolution by the Congress commended "the Library of

Congress and its employees, both past and present, on 200 years of service to the


Congress and the Nation." A Presidential proclamation on April 21, 2000, stated that

“The Library of Congress is truly America's Library." Commemorative coins and a stamp

were issued. There were privately funded bicentennial exhibitions, symposia, events,

and publications. Almost 1,300 Local Legacies projects -- from all 50 states -- were

registered by more than 400 Members of Congress documenting traditional community

[ocr errors]

life. Many special donations were made to the collections; and the Library was given the

largest single monetary gift in its history by Mr. John W. Kluge.

The Library of Congress is entering a critical period when it must, in effect,

superimpose a select library of digital materials onto its traditional artifactual library if it is

to continue to be a responsive and dynamic force for the Congress and the nation. We


are not seeking appropriatens for ry Tm Urcion, but merely trying to sustain our

hesti exwe hinchon of acquiring, presering, and malerg accessible knowledge and

into at anon, which are now being generated and communicated in a radically new

There is a special need this year for the Law Library and the American Folklife

Center. They will play important national roles but have been seriousiy depleted, having

received no significant funding increases from the Congress for many years.

[ocr errors]

With congressional support of our fiscal 2002 budget, the Library of Congress

will continue its dedicated service to the work of the Congress and to the creative life of

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]


[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Mr. TAYLOR. Thank you, Dr. Billington. The largest increase in the budget is for the National Digital Library, $21.5 million and 58 FTEs. This request is in addition to the $100 million previously appropriated in FY 2001 which required this program be carried out in accordance with a plan., or plans approved by the Committee on House Administration of the House, the Committee on Rules of the Senate, and the Committees on Appropriations of the House and Senate.

I can tell you, as you continue to build the Digital Library, it is serving the country well with additional opportunities to do a great deal more, we are appreciative of that initiation. Would you like to bring us up to date on the plan?

Dr. BILLINGTON. Yes, Mr. Chairman. Basically the Library of Congress is superimposing a digital library on the traditional artifactual library; that is, the traditional books, the movies, the films, the photographs, the maps, the periodicals, all are in tangible artifactual form. The digital revolution is really presenting every aspect of the Library with a whole new view.

Now, this is not a new function for the Library. The classic function of acquiring, preserving, and making accessible the collections that bring knowledge and information to the Congress and to the Nation is now to be done in a new format, and it affects all aspects of the Library. As the world's largest library and most comprehensive one, we simply have to be able to provide for the Congress what is happening in the digital universe.

Thanks to support of the Congress and we are very grateful for thatthe success of the National Digital Library Program, and the other services that we have provided, we have moved, I think, dramatically into the digital area. There are three aspects to the digital activities of the Library of Congress. The first is itself, the National Digital Library. That is, the historical collections that we have put on the Internet; material already in the Library that we have converted into digital form. That effort has been funded already. We met the target of having 5 million items online of our national heritage, the great historic documents of america.

We have a program with two national libraries—Russia and the Spanish National Library. The National Digital Library is becoming an international one. It is basically the conversion of existing materials, mostly from the Library of Congress, and a few others. We have incorporated 34 other repositories in America and added to that. That is nearly 7 million items now of American history and culture and of the broader world impinging on America. That is the first part. That has been funded and it is continuing.

The second aspect to the Library's digital program that is crucial, and which is what we are asking for in this budget, is the technical backbone infrastructure that will support what is called the “lifecycle management of digital material,” which is coming in all ways. We acquire things in four different ways. We get gifts, we make direct purchases, copyright deposits, which is most of our American materials, and let's see what-oh, yes, exchanges.

In all of these categories of acquiring things, more and more of

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »