Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, 1. sējums;14. sējumsPublished for John Conrad and Company, 1816 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
admiralty admitted affirmed agent alleged appeal Attwood Auld authority belligerant bill bond bottomry Britain British brought capture cargo cause circuit court claim claimants collector Commercen common law condemnation congress constitution contended contraband contract conveyance court of equity Daniel Cross debt decision declared decree deed defendant delivered the opinion district court Dunlop enemy enemy's entitled entry equity evidence executed fact farther proof February Term forfeiture France freight French grant Hepburn & Dundas Hunter's Lessee hypothecation instructions insured judge judgment judicial power jury L'Invincible land law of France letter liable lick Lord Martin master ment Messrs neutral neutral country object original owner parties person plaintiff in error port possession principle prize courts prize of war proceedings purchase question reason rule ship specific performance statute suit supposed supreme court tickets tion trade treaty tribunals United vendee vessel vested voyage writ of error
Populāri fragmenti
352. lappuse - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty, or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity ; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
326. lappuse - The powers not delegated to the United States are reserved to the states, respectively, or to the people.' The government of the United States, therefore, can claim no powers which are not granted to it by the constitution, and the powers actually granted must be such as are expressly given, or given by necessary implication.
368. lappuse - That a final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had...
22. lappuse - ... exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas...
94. lappuse - Is the Cherokee nation a foreign state in the sense in which that term is used in the Constitution ? The counsel for the plaintiffs have maintained the affirmative of this proposition with great earnestness and ability.
357. lappuse - But no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal in any such case as aforesaid, than such as appears on the face of the record, and immediately respects the before mentioned questions of validity or construction of the said constitution, treaties, statutes, commissions, or authorities in dispute.
353. lappuse - States, in the same manner and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect, as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a...
306. lappuse - The court is unanimously of opinion, that the appellate power of the Supreme Court of the United States does not extend to this court, under a sound construction of the Constitution of the United States ; that so much of the 25th section of the Act of Congress to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States, as extends the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to this court, is not in pursuance of the Constitution of the United States; that the writ of error, in this...
331. lappuse - It would seem, therefore, to follow, that congress are bound to create some inferior courts in which to vest all that jurisdiction which, under the constitution, is exclusively vested in the United States, and of which the supreme court cannot take original cognizance.
17. lappuse - It is the opinion of a majority of the court that the mere grant to Congress of the power to regulate commerce did not deprive the States of power to regulate pilots, and that although Congress has legislated on this subject, its legislation manifests an intention, with a single exception, not to regulate this subject, but to leave its regulation to the...