Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

tinctly the recent changes in, and existing principles of, the Law of Evidence, and to bring down the review of cases to the date of publication. The Chapter on the Measure of Damages, is also, as far as I am aware, a new feature in a Treatise on the Law of Evidence.

THE TEMPLE,
January, 1856.

E. P.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

152

389

[blocks in formation]

Bowman v. Taylor .......................52, 140
Boydell v. Drummond...344, 356
Boyle v. Webster....
Boyle v. Wiseman
Bracegirdle v. Orford
Bradfield v. Tupper
Bradley v. James
Brain v. Price.......
Bramwell v. Lucas
Brand v. Akerman
Brandford v. Freeman.

Brashiel v. Jackson...
Brazin v. Jones
Brett v. Beales
Brickell v. Hulse..
Brierley v. Kendell
Brine v. Bazalgetti
Bringloe v. Goodair..
Briscoe v. Lomax
Bristow v. Secqueville..
Bristow v. Wright
Broad v. Pitt
Bromage v. Prosser
Bromley v. Wallace....
Brookes v. Marshınan.
Brough v. Parkins
Brown v. Jenkins

Carruthers v. Graham

......

Carter v. Boehm ......54, 55, 56
Carter v. Pryke
Castelli v. Groome
Cates v. Hardacre

227 Chandler v. Horne
143 Chaplin v. Levy
128 Cherry v. Heming
126 Cheslyn v. Dalby

275 Clay v. Thackrah
244 Clayton v. Blakey
288 Cleave v. Jones
230

Clifford v. Parker
208 Clifford v. Turrell
52 Clunnes v. Pezzy
85 Clunn v. Morris
249 Coates v. Bambridge
173 Cobden v. Kendrick
66 Cock v. Baker....................
47 Cocks v. Nash
236 Coe v. Allingham
184 Coggs v. Barnard
242 Cole v. Parkin

....

205

...............

... 265

31

[blocks in formation]

............ 377

148

324

327

64 Chesman v. Court

152

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
« iepriekšējāTurpināt »