Route 2, Box 17-A The Honorable Charles B. Rangel Dear Mr. Rangle: RE: Hendrickson, Wil Statement in lieu of In compliance with PR #18 which accompanied your letter to me dated April 8, 1982, the following is submitted in regard to above captioned: TOPICAL OUTLINE A. Supreme Court case citations in support of ruling that the 16th (Exhibit "N") See Article I, section 8. clause 12, U.S. Constitution, together with Supreme Court cases in support of this termination on reverse side of Exhibit "N" and labelled Exhibit "N-2". C. Forms N-2 for those years in question. D. Levy without due process of law (USAFAC Form 20-109, dated Nov. 12, 1981 and Form 668-W (Rev. 12078), dated Sep. 11, 1981, labelled Exhibits "H" and "H-1". E. I hereby certify that these amounts were actually withheld from my wages checks in the case of withholding W-2 forms, and levied on my disability retired pay, unlawfully, and without the ruling of a Court of competent jurisdiction. SPECIFIC COMPLAINT I. Violation of First Amendment Right to Petition Government for A. Above has been submitted on numerous occasions by certified II. Violation of 4th and 5th Amendment. B. Invasion of my privacy person, property, and papers [NOTE TO READER: Additional materials retained in subcommittee files.] Disability Retired Pay - without a warrant and without due process. III. Violation of 6th and 7th Amendment. IV. V. A. Right to a speedy trial by jury in controversies involving Violation of 8th Amendment. A. Right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment Violation of 13th Amendment. A. Unlawful extortion of Withholding when law related thereto self-destructed no later than January 1946. DEMAND A. Refund of all monies previously withheld and levied upon together with interest to date of refund. B. After monies have been refunded, and should the IRS feel that they have a legitimate complaint against me, then I will be more than happy to defend my position in a Common Law Court and before an unbiased and Common Law Judge. P.S. Will be happy to furnish any addit- Respectfully submitted, Rodendrickson Wil Hendrickson [NOTE TO READER: Additional materials retained in subcommittee files.] RE: TAXPAYER SAFEGUARD HEARINGS AND UNLAWFUL IRS ACTIVITY. Dear Cairman Rangel, Please enter the following remarks into the record as testimony in the taxpayer safeguard hearings. In the middle 1970's I paid the IRS and had the cancelled check I recommend the following solutions to IRS abuse of taxpayers: 3. Requiring 1 year of accounting training for all IRS agents. 5. Make all IRS agents civilly liable for the violation of taxpayer privacy by a $500 small claims award if the agent mades an incorrect statement, or assessment on the person. 6. Eliminate the criminal penalties of Title 26 $7201, 7203 and replace them with civil penalties after a common law trial in U.S. DIstrict Court. When a taxpayer is in jail you can't get any taxes out of him at any level. If the IRS can prove he owes the tax you can get the tax through legal processes and he is still paying state and federal tax. 7. The IRS should become an agency of the U.S. Congress. Only congress is authorized to lay and collect taxes. In this way each congressman could have direct control over the IRS. I declare under penalty of perjury the the above testimony is true Signed By Brid Frá Klicher Rev. Bradford Henschel P.O. Box 4578 Inglewood, Ca. 90309 ATTACHED Elisirs BK-Ret for Recal sestimony RECEIVED APR 2 1 1982 Ways and Means Dear Reg. Rangel, The IRS has been harassing me for years. They do things that how been outlived to any other collection agency. You should put IRS into the angress and give each Congressman authority over all IRS in his area, even to stop all action on given cases. Also you should enact HR 493. Kandall Hunt 235 N. Breadway breath, ca. 93454 My name is: Leo Itz of Route #1, Box 330; Fredericksburg, Statement: On November 4,1980, we received from the Internal Revenue office of 300 East 8th Street; Austin, Texas 78701, their letter Form 1085, dated November 3,1980 including a Form 941, Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return, Prepared by the I.R.S. for our signature. (Note: The Leo Itz Trust never had employees, it only contracts.) We mailed a Certified Return Receipt letter on November 20, 1980, stating we had no knowledge of any such figures as they stated. The I.R.S. has not to this date answered this letter, but the I.R.S. totally disregarded it (letter) and June 17,1981 the I.R.S. filed Form 668 Notice of Federal Tax Lien. We have no record of any employees nor has the I.R.S. any record of the Leo Itz Trust to have any employees in the materials I.R.3. has. IN fact no employees existed ever for the Leo Itz Trust. This lien was placed falsely and caused the Leo Itz Trust much anquish as all properties were tied up because of this false lien causing a Bank Forclosure, Savings and Loan Forclosure, where upon the Trust sold at a despearing LOSS, properties that were not intended ever to be sold, as, this property had been in the family since 1853. The I.R.S. truly abused its own regulation namely Section 3401 (a)(b)(c)(d) invalid as the Leo Itz Trust does not fit into this section by reason of Contracts making Section 3402 (a) also invalid as no employees existed. So therefore The Leo Itz Trust was "not Required" to make a Form 941 Return. Therefore by "not required to file" The Leo Itz Trust exercised its rights and duty by not filing illegally Form 941. Under Section 6020 (b)(1) the I.R.S. itself did....., or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false or fraudulent return,....to the Leo Itz Trust. And because of this abuse the Leo Itz Trust suffered very very very much. We therefore submit this to the Committee with hope the Committee will use this to bring about Legislative action to correct and bring back to us Liberty, Freedom, and Justice. Yours truly, 11-241 - 4 Leo Itz Route #1, Box 330 Fredericksburg, Texas 78624 |